SB AdvisoryThe LIRR is on strike, disrupting the ability for commuters to get to and from the Stony Brook campus.  More information
Skip Navigation
Search

Christian Luhmann, Ph.D.


Vanderbilt University (2006)
Associate Professor, Cognitive Science

Dr. Christian Luhmann: Please check back soon for updated recruitment information.

Luhmann

Contact:

christian.luhmann@stonybrook.edu
Office: Psychology B-250
Phone: (631) 632-7086

Visit Website

Research Interests:

Decision making, learning, and computational modeling

Current Research:

My lab focuses on complex behavior with a particular focus on decision making and learning and the interplay between these behaviors. We explore these interests in a variety of domains. We also use a variety of methodological tools, including behavior and computational modeling as well as neuroscientific methods such as EEG and fMRI. I am interested in how people make decisions in the face of incomplete, inconsistent, ambiguous, or uncertain information. I am exploring this interest in a variety of domains. Utilizing behavioral and computational methods, my work in the area of learning suggests that learners are adept at dealing with incomplete data, a situation ignored by current learning theories. Utilizing functional magnetic resonance imaging, my work in economic decision-making explores the neural bases of decision-makers' ability to foresee, evaluate, and react to the presence of uncertainty. My behavioral work on perceptual decision-making explores both how even relatively simple decisions involve integrating noisy information over time and how decision-makers evaluate quantities such as confidence.

Book Chapters and Reviews:

Rottman, B., Ahn, W., & Luhmann, C. C. (2011). When and how do people reason about unobserved causes? In P. M. Illari, F. Russo, & J. Williamson (Eds.), Causality in the Sciences (pp. 150-183), Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ahn, W., Marsh, J. K., & Luhmann, C. C. (2007). Dynamic interpretations of covariation data. In Gopnik, A., & Schultz, L. (Eds.), Causal Learning: Psychology, Philosophy, and Computation (pp. 280-293). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Representative Publications:

 *Indicates a mentored graduate student author

**Indicates a mentored undergraduate/high school student author

Luhmann, C. C., & Rajaram, S. (2015). Memory transmission in small groups and large networks: An agent-based model. Psychological
Science, 26, 1909-1917.

Liu, P., Safin, V., Yang, B., & Luhmann, C. C. (2015). Direct and indirect influence of altruistic behavior in a social network. PLoS
ONE, 10(10).

**Massi, B., & Luhmann, C. C. (in press). Fairness influences reward-related neural processing, Cognitive, Behavioral, and Affective Neuroscience, 15, 768-775.

*Bixter, M. T., & Luhmann, C. C. (2015). Evidence for implicit risk: Delay primes the processing of uncertainty. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 28, 347-359.

*Arfer, K. B., & Luhmann, C. C. (2015). The predictive accuracy of intertemporal-choice models, British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 68, 326–341.

*Liu, P., & Luhmann, C. C. (2015). Evidence for online processing during causal learning, Learning & Behavior, 43, 1-11.

Ferson, S., Antonenko, A., O’Rawe, J., Siegrist, J., Mickley, J., Luhmann, C., Sentz, K., Parles, C. & Finkel, A. (2014). Natural language of uncertainty: Numeric hedge words, International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 57, 19-39.

*Bixter, M. T., *Trimber, E. M. & Luhmann, C. C. (2014). Contagion effects in intertemporal decision making.  In P. Bello, M. Guarini, M. McShane, & B. Scassellati (Eds.), Proceedings of the 36th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1929-1934). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.

Luhmann, C. C., & *Bixter, M. T. (2014). Subjective hazard rates rationalize “irrational” temporal preferences.  In P. Bello, M. Guarini, M. McShane, & B. Scassellati (Eds.), Proceedings of the 36th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 904-909). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.

Bixter, M. T., & Luhmann, C. C. (2014). Shared losses reduce sensitivity to risk: A laboratory study of moral hazard, Journal of Economic Psychology, 42, 63-73.

Luhmann, C. C. (2013). Discounting of delayed rewards is not hyperbolic. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39, 1274-1279.

Luhmann, C. C., & Rajaram, S. (2013). Mnemonic diffusion: An agent-based modeling investigation of collective memory.  In M. Knauff, M. Pauen, N. Sebanz, & I. Wachsmuth (Eds.), Proceedings of the 35th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 936-941). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.

Luhmann, C. C., & **Pak, S. S. (2013). Won’t you think of the children?: Traits predicting intergenerational preferences.  In M.Knauff, M. Pauen, N. Sebanz, & I. Wachsmuth (Eds.), Proceedings of the 35th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 2949-2954). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.

*Bixter, M. T., & Luhmann, C. C. (2013). Adaptive intertemporal preferences in foraging-style environments. Frontiers in Decision Neuroscience, 7.

Liu, P., & Luhmann, C. C. (2013). Evidence that a transient, but cognitively demanding process underlies forward blocking.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66, 744-766.

Kujawa, A., Smith, E., Luhmann, C. C., & Hajcak, G. (2013). The feedback negativity reflects favorable compared to non-favorable outcomes based on global, not local, alternatives. Psychophysiology, 50, 134-138.

Weinberg, A., Luhmann, C. C., Bress, J. N., & Hajcak, G. (2012). Better late than never? The effect of feedback delay on ERP indices of reward processing, Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience, 12, 671-677.

Luhmann, C. C. (2011). Integrating spatial context learning over contradictory signals: Recency effects in contextual cueing. Visual Cognition, 19, 846-862.

Luhmann, C. C., & Ahn, W. (2011). Order effects during learning: Expectations and interpretations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,37, 568-587.

*Liu, P., & Luhmann, C. C. (2011). Blocking requires uncertainty about novel cues. In L. Carlson, C. Hölscher, & T. Shipley (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1697-1702). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.

Luhmann, C. C., Ishida, K., & Hajcak, G. (2011). Intolerance of uncertainty and decisions about delayed, probabilistic rewards. Behavior Therapy, 42, 378-386.