Data Governance Council 2023-24 Annual Report

September 2024

Overview

Stony Brook’s data governance system was established in fall 2016 in order to improve Stony Brook’s data infrastructure. The Data Governance Council (DGC) oversees the data governance system and began meeting in spring 2017. This is the seventh annual report of the DGC. 

We welcomed our new executive sponsors, Dr. Braden Hosch, VP for Educational & Institutional Effectiveness, and Dr. Simeon Ananou, VP for Information Technology and Chief Information Officer. They expressed three themes that would pose significant importance for data governance (1) mitigating risks on sensitive data, (2) process improvement for university data as we implement a new ERP system for financials, budget and HR, and (3) Communication from the DGC to educate, generate awareness and to celebrate accomplishments.

Major Accomplishments

  • Initiated analyses for a data disposition project to mitigate risk on sensitive data collected through admissions processes
  • Launched a new data governance website
  • Drafted guidelines for appropriate use of data
  • Continued growing the digital business definitions in the Data Cookbook
  • Developed data model for reporting of administrative roles
  • Continued to collect data access management procedures from data stewards




2023-24 Members


Kim Berlin, Chair  Analytics and Enterprise Data Officer
Diane Bello, Co-Chair  University Registrar
Ahmed Belazi  Student Affairs designee
Cassandra Amadio  University Controller
David Cyrille  Health Sciences designee
David Ecker University Senate designee
Jeffrey Mackey Finance & Administration designee
Jim Gonzales  Information Technology designee
Judith Brown Clarke  Chief Diversity Officer designee
Marrisa Trachtenberg  Enterprise Risk Management designee
Nicholas Prewett  Chief Financial Aid Officer
Richard Beatty  Chief Enrollment Management Officer
Robert Davidson  Research designee
Susan Agro  Advancement designee
Theresa Diemer  Chief Institutional Research Officer designee
Tracey McEachern  Human Resources designee
Arielle Markiewicz, Business Analyst for Data Governance, ex officio

Data Disposition for Student Admissions Data 

Following the success of the Financial Aid Office’s data purging from 2022-23, it was decided to continue the agenda with a second, larger scope. A subcommittee composed of Richard Beatty, Kim Berlin, Nicholas Prewett, Rob Davidson, Andrew Kirsch, and David Taiclet was empaneled with the goal to establish data retention guidelines and develop a repeatable process to remove sensitive data generated when student applications are uploaded and processed through admissions systems.

The scope for the population is for applicants that never enrolled. These are individuals who were never a student, never an employee, an affiliate or a relative of a student. The main objectives are to ensure that the university retains personal data for as long as it is needed, to reduce risk and penalties due to a data breach, to reduce legally discoverable information, and to improve system performance for search-match capabilities in PeopleSoft.

The team identified University data systems that maintain student admissions data, researched retention guidelines for the university, SUNY, and NY state, established the scope of the population to purge, and conducted preliminary analyses of tables and number of records. The financial aid project purged ‘operational’ records that provide a financial aid profile and FAFSA form. We realized after considerable analysis, that operational records for student admission applications are not the sources of highly sensitive data and that to focus on them would not mitigate risk and it would require extensive IT resources to analyze impact along nearly a thousand tables. The team recommends a different approach from the financial aid project, to target specific tables that contain PII data and to tackle PII data elements one at a time in a
phased approach.

The Council recommends the assembly of a technical team to assess and confirm the location of the PII fields within PeopleSoft, to analyze the options for removal – purge vs mask, and to analyze the impacts of removal.

Management of Administrative Roles

Faculty who are engaged in administrative functions are not easily identified in these roles by their job title alone. Employee job records are restricted to one job even though many hold more than one role at the University. We explored and compared two options for maintaining these data. One in a delivered PeopleSoft panel called “Administrative Posts” and an existing, custom- built PeopleSoft panel called “contact categories”. We opted to continue use of the custom, existing process since it is used heavily in health sciences, and more effort would be involved in migrating these data, ramping up a new process and training to use the delivered Administrative Post panel.

We extended the contact categories to maintain Post Doctoral appointments and developed a data warehouse model that includes the capture of monthly snapshots of all contact categories. A reporting process to academic units for Post Docs was piloted and proved successful for
improved reporting and analytics of these data. It is understood that the new WolfieOne HCM will store these data differently, but having a process in place now will provide an avenue for migration into the new Oracle Cloud system. Upcoming phases for 2024-25 will be to extend
these categories to additional administrative roles for faculty and expanding the reporting to more units.

Communication Campaign

One area that has been on our radar for many years and has been consistently ranked lower on our biannual maturity assessments is “Communication”. A major push was initiated this year to develop more communication and publicly available content to present Data Governance activities at Stony Brook University and to educate, generate awareness, and increase knowledge around data policies and data access processes. A subcommittee was empaneled to create a strategy and establish a long-term practice to increase knowledge and awareness about data governance. The subcommittee, consisting of Theresa Diemer, Susan Agro, and Arielle Markiewicz, conferred with Marketing & Communication and the Office of Change Management for guidance on effective methods to initiating a communication campaign.

Snapshot of Data Governance website home page



A new Data Governance website was launched in spring 2024 to replace an older, outdated subsite nested within the IRPE home page. The new website provides a modern presentation and information about data governance organization and structures, data assets, policies and standards, introduce data governance concepts, to inform stakeholders and to share outcomes of data governance activities. The official launch for this website will be in Fall 2024. https://www.stonybrook.edu/datagovernance

Upcoming phases for 2024-25 will be to share outcomes through the website and targeted email newsletters.


Data Access Procedures

There are two on-going projects relevant to the “Policy on Data and Data Access” that was adopted by the University in March 2023. The first is collecting information from Data Stewards about access controls and procedures for their data assets. This includes how access to data is requested, how routine and non-routine access to data is evaluated and granted, how permissions are given for special privileges, and for how users are routinely removed and
reviewed.

We started collecting this information in spring 2023 through a questionnaire called the “Data Access Management Procedures”. Procedures have been collected from Data Stewards for just over 50% of data assets, and a bit more if we exclude FSA assets. Collection of these procedures will continue in the next year.

Appropriate Use of Data

The second project related to the above-mentioned policy and to mitigate risks to the university regarding access to sensitive data is to provide guidelines on the appropriate use of data. Standards and practices about appropriate uses, handling and sharing of data are not broadly or
commonly recognized. It requires knowledge about data security, data privacy and sensitivity policies, when and how data sharing is appropriate and allowable, and understanding the landscape of new and changing technologies for transmitting and sharing data.

A subcommittee was formed consisting of Jeff Mackey, Marrisa Trachtenberg, and Diane Bello to establish guidelines for appropriate use of university data and IT resources in ways to respect and protect the privacy of individuals whose records are accessed. This topic is still developing, with plans to review and refine the language for the guidelines and decisions on the mechanism for delivery and communication.

Data asset inventory

The DGC has been maintaining an inventory of University data assets on the West campus. The number of data assets dropped from 95 assets to 92. In 2023-24, one new data asset was added, and four were retired. One difference from last year is that FSA assets were moved from VP Finance & Administration into VP Student Affairs. Below is a tally of University data assets, excluding Health Systems for the 13 Data Trustees with a breakout of the FSA assets. Additional information about data assets continues to be collected to comply with the requirements of the “Policy on Data and Data Access”.

Data Trustees

# Data Assets

Provost

21

Chief Information Officer

12

Vice President Finance & Administration

11

Vice President for Educational and Institutional Effectiveness

7

Vice President Student Affairs

6

    - FSA

 

12

Vice President for Research

5

Vice President of Human Resource Services

3

Executive Vice President Health Sciences

2

Vice President for Advancement

3

Director of Athletics

2

Vice President for Enterprise Risk Management and Chief Security Officer

2

Vice President for Facilities and Services

2

Vice President for Marketing and Communications

1

Grand Total

92



Continued implementation of the Data Cookbook

The Data Cookbook is a digital repository for Stony Brook University to manage a data dictionary, report and dashboard profiles and functional and technical definitions.  Currently, it includes data definitions for academic, human resources, budget and financials data elements. The Data Governance Business Analyst, Arielle Markiewicz, has advanced this work and added 59 definitions for a total of 198 and added a number of new report profiles for a total of 68. Metadata for data types, allowable values and ranges was also incorporated by the Enterprise Data & Analytics (EDA) office. 

This information has started to be made available through Tableau Analytics dashboards. It is planned to continue this effort to make definitions available and integrate them with all reporting products that are released. 




 

 

 

 

ANNUAL REPORT 2024-25

                                             

ANNUAL REPORT 2023-24

                                             

ANNUAL REPORT 2022-23

ANNUAL REPORT 2021-22

                                             

ANNUAL REPORT 2020-21

                                             

ANNUAL REPORT 2019-20

ANNUAL REPORT 2018-19

                                             

ANNUAL REPORT 2017-18