Past graduate electives/seminars
In this seminar, we will read about and discuss functional explanations for the structure
of language and languages. Can patterns that we see in language be attributed to a
drive towards efficient, (near-)optimal communication? If so, when? What can popular
methodologies for uncovering functional optimization really tell us? This course will
combine discussion on current trends in computational and cognitive approaches to
functional explanations for language structure with classic debates in the linguistic
and biological evolutionary literature. Studying syntactic change The goal of this seminar is to provide the necessary background and Within the generative framework, structural positions are traditionally distinguished
as being A(rgument) vs. A-bar. The former are positions that can be occupied by arguments, thus can be assigned
a theta-role; the latter form an Elsewhere or negative category, denoting positions
that are not A positions. This binary division has major implications for operations
in syntax and the rules that apply to them: e.g. movement (A movement is typically
bounded within finite clauses, while A-bar movement is not), Case assignment (only
available for A positions), argument structure, agreement, and binding, among others. This course will focus on the syntax of A positions. What empirical diagnostics distinguish A- from A-bar phenomena? How is the A- vs.
A-bar distinction theoretically modelled? How do we deal with hybrid A/A-bar effects
in languages like Dinka and Korean? How does the A vs. A-bar distinction shape our
understanding of syntactic locality? We will investigate these and related issues by examining a series of dependencies that affect and involve A positions, such as: phi-agreement, case, argument-structure, control, (hyper-)raising, EPP, object shift, passivization, binding, & certain types of scrambling. Experimental Phonetics This first level course for graduate students has two broad goals. The Course Description: LIN 572 explores how to plan & implement an instructional course in all its phases.
Although it‘s focus is on design of a one-semester college-level course, the theory
and implementation ideas developed are relevant and applicable to instruction in
all educational settings, including K-12 classes, and industrial, corporate and governmental
training courses & seminars. In a given semester LIN 572 will adopt a specific curriculum
design framework and will explore the practical creation of courses within that framework. In Spr 2022, LIN 572 will explore “Understanding by Design” (UbD), which takes an
unconventional, “backwards” approach. UbD begins from the desired course outcomes,
then moves to assessment, and only then moves to content design and instruction.
UbD principles will be develpoed in the context of a concrete joint task: designing
an Introduction to Linguistics course. Pursuing this task we will: develop a syllabus,
curriculum guide, lesson plans, classrooms activities, pedagogical strategies, etc.
We will also explore alternative delivery models, including standard lecture format,
flipped classroom, blended classroom, etc. Course Objectives: Course Work: The work for LIN 572 will involve: Alternative titles for this course are, in increasing order of presumptuousness: The premise is a simple one: every syntax course starts out with big picture questions
— language acquisition, syntax as a window into the human mind, genetic endowment — and dangles those carrots
in front of you to get you interested, but two weeks in they suddenly disappear and all you get is the stick
of constituency tests and binding and linearization algorithms. This course develops
an alternative vision of syntax that is all about the carrots. Make no mistake, if you want to analyze syntactic phenomena, there will be
tons of opportunities for you, but this course presents a vision of linguistics where languages and their idiosyncracies
are just a means to an end. We will cover a variety of topics, including: But as so often, a picture says more than a thousand words: Don’t you worry, by the end of the course you’ll understand. Instructor: Owen Rambow, owen.rambow@stonybrook.edu We use language to convey our cognitive states (what we believe, desire, intend) and
to affect our audience’s cognitive state (make them adopt a belief, desire, or intention).
Furthermore, we must model our fellow discourse participants’ cognitive state in order
to be a cooperative discourse participant (the common ground). There is a vast literature
which covers this topic, spanning the disciplines of cognitive science, artificial
intelligence, natural language processing, linguistics (semantics and pragmatics),
philosophy, and social psychology. Frequently, the terms used in different disciplines
for the same concept are different, and authors are not always aware of related work. In this seminar, we want to tackle this vast literature, but always with a view towards
the computational modeling of cognitive state. Language use is inherently dynamic:
our cognitive state and our model of our discourse partners’ cognitive state are updated
in response to the evolving discourse. Understanding conversation means modeling
change. Core concepts we will cover include belief, desire, intentions; the common
ground; presuppositions; argumentation; and belief and sentiment analysis in NLP. The course readings and class presentations will cover three areas: Participants will be required to critically present several papers over the course
of the semester, and work on a class project, possibly as part of a group. Class
projects will be tailored to the interests of the students, but they should include
the use of existing annotated resources. Possible projects include: The seminar will consider syntax-PF interactions, broadly conceived. Some topics
we'll look at are hierarchical representation and linearization, spellout and phases,
ellipsis, syntactic copying and reduplication, and intonation. Particular emphases
will be determined by the interests of the participants. Requirements: do the reading, participate in discussion, write a couple short pieces and a longer
research paper. Those taking the course for partial credit are welcome and will be
asked to do a subset of the work. Course Description Morphology is the study of words, word formation, and word analysis. This course is
about computational morphology, which is the study of these topics from a computational perspective. One of the most influential approaches today, and the one that drives much of the
software on laptops and smartphones, is based on finite-state technology. Much of
the course is dedicated to understanding how this technology works, to understanding
how it relates to linguistic theories of morphology, and to becoming a proficient
user of this technology for morphological analysis. Course Objectives The goal of this course is to become familiar with both the theory and the practice of computational methods of morphological analysis and recognition. In particular
we study weighted finite-state transducers and the composition operation, which generalizes many morphological processes including concatenation,
truncation, root-and-pattern morphology and others. We pay special attention to irregular
morphology and exceptions. Students will learn to use the grammar libraries Thrax and Pynini that are part of the openFST toolkit http://www.openfst.org/twiki/bin/view/FST/WebHome In addition to these core topics, depending on the students' interests, additional
topics covered include higher-level logical and DATR-like descriptions of morphology
and the machine learning of morphology. Course website In this seminar we will look at issues involving three (related) topics in syntactic
theory: islands, edges, and phases. The first of these will involve going back a bit
into the syntactic literature to cover early discussion of islandhood, including subjacency
and barriers, and then look at how some island effects are (or are not) covered under
minimalism. Requirements: weekly readings, discussions, occasional short written responses, and a research paper
(which can be joint work with others in the class) Auditors (and folk taking it for less than 3 credits) are welcome. In order of priority, auditors
are expected to (i) come to class (ii) do the primary readings (iii) do the short
writing assignments (iv) be part of at least joint research project. Readings:
Fall 2023
Spring 2023
structure of signed languages and gestural systems. It is designed for
graduate students in linguistics with no prior sign language knowledge. You
may pick up a few American Sign Language (ASL) signs along the way, but
this is not an ASL language course. Sample topics include phonology,
morphology, sign order & spatial grammar, grammatical use of facial
expressions, constructed action, and role of iconicity. We will also
discuss gesture, homesign, language emergence, historical change, dialects,
acquisition, bilingualism, and sign language disorders. As part of a class
project, we will collaborate to develop a resource archive of online videos
of sign language exemplars that will be useful for future instructional use
(e.g., in an Introductory course on Linguistics). The course format
includes Dr. Singleton’s lectures and student-led discussions on the
assigned readings. Students will contribute posts to four online discussion
prompts during the semester and complete a course paper on a sign
language-related topic (to be developed in consultation with Dr.
Singleton).
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact
jenny.singleton@stonybrook.edu
millions of people in many countries, has been the subject of a great deal
of influential work in linguistic theory and, more recently, in
computational work. This course will explore aspects of the morphology and
phonology of Arabic (including both Standard Arabic and various vernacular
dialects), especially those aspects that have figured in theoretical
discussions.
The goal is two-fold: To give students an acquaintance with the structure
of a language that's very different from European (and East-Asian)
languages, and to give some access to the large body of theoretical work
that has been done on Arabic. We will begin with exercises and readings
designed to acquaint students with salient features and phenomena of
Arabic, as a basis for understanding the more analytical readings.
Fall 2022
hands-on experience to begin doing original research on syntactic change.
We will begin with delineating exactly what syntactic change is and
considering the considerable special challenges it presents to the
researcher. We will then get an overview of different types of syntactic
change and empirical generalizations that have been proposed to
characterize it, followed by a consideration of major theoretical
approaches to understanding and explaining changes. We will devote the last
portion of the course to learning and applying the modern methodologies
that have been developed to meet the challenges of studying syntactic
change, in particular the use of electronic corpora and associated
quantitative tools. Auditors are welcome.
first is to increase “phonetic literacy ”, meaning that students will have
a solid foundation of knowledge they can use to read and extract value from
papers with phonetic data in them. The second goal is to give each student
new skills they can bring to enriching their own research with phonetic
data. In addition to reading and discussion, we will do some hands-on
acoustic analysis together. Seeing is believing afterall and as with
everything, we have to actually do it to get better at it. Depending on
student interest, we will also discuss other types of data and how they can
best inform studies of the “sound” aspects of speech.
Spring 2022

Fall 2021
Spring 2021
Fall 2020
Spring 2020
Fall 2019
Spring 2019
Fall 2018
Edges and phases will then be discussed with respect to issues of successive cyclic
movement, tucking-in, phasehood, dynamic phase theory, and relevant aspects of cartography.
• Chomsky, Noam (1986) Barriers
• Adger, D., de Cat, C., and Tsoulas, G.(eds) (2004) Peripheries: syntactic edges
and their effects.
• Numerous recent articles on syntactic movement