• Baier, A.  (1994).  Trust and Antitrust,”  “Trust and Its Vulnerabilities.”  In Moral Prejudices: Essays on Ethics.  Cambridge: Harvard University Pr.

  • Bailey, T.  (2002).  “On Trust and Philosophy.”  BBC Reith Lectures,

  • Barber, B. (1983).  The Logic and Limits of Trust.  New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

  • Crease, Robert P. "The Paradox of Trust in Science," Physics World March 2004: 18. (.pdf download)

  • Gelvin, M. (2000).  Truth and the Comedic Art (Albany: SUNY Press).

  • Grim, P. (1997).  "Undecidability in the Spatialized Prisoner's Dilemma," Theory and Decision, 42, 53-80.
    ____.     (1996)  "Spatialization and Greater Generosity in the Stochastic Prisoner's Dilemma," BioSystems,                         37, 3-17.
    ____.     (1995) "The Greater Generosity of the Spatialized Prisoner's Dilemma," Journal of Theoretical                       Biology, 173, 353-359.

  • Grim, P., G. Mar and P. St. Denis (1998), The Philosophical Computer, MIT Press 1998, chs 4, 5, 6.

  • Hollis, M.  (1998).  Trust Within Reason.  Cambridge: Cambridge University Pr.

  • Holton, Richard 'Deciding to Trust, Coming to Believe' Australasian Journal of Philosophy Vol. 72 No. 1; March 1994.

  • Jones, K.  (1998).  “Trust”.  Routledge Encyclopaedia of Philosophy.

  • Lingis, A.  (2004).  Trust.  Minneapolis: Univ. of Minnesota Pr.

  • Nussbaum, M. (2001).  The Fragility of Goodness : Luck and Ethics in Greek Tragedy and Philosophy.  Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.


  • Benedek, T. (1938).  “Adaptation to Reality in Early Infancy.”  Psychoanal. Quart. 7.

  • Erikson, E. (1950).  Childhood and Society, Norton.

  • Holmes, J. and J. Rempel. (1989).  “Trust in Close Relationships,” in C. Hendrick, ed. Review of Personality and Social Psychology 10, pp. 187-220.  London: Sage

  • Isaacs, K. S., Alexander, J. M. (1963).  “Faith, Trust, and Gullibility.”  Int. J. Psychoanalysis 44:461-469.

  • Luhmann, N. (1979). Trust and Power.  Chichester, Wiley.


  • Buber, M.  (1953).  I and Thou.  Edinburgh, T. T. Clark, & T. Clark.

  • Burrell, D.  (2000).  Friendship and the Ways to Truth.  Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.

  • Donovan, G.  (2002).  “Trust in Religion Reaches Lowest Point in 30 Years.”  National Catholic Reporter, July 19.

  • Joseph Godfrey, "Conceiving Trust for Philosophy of Religion,"

  • Gratton, C. (1982).  Trusting: theory and practice.  Crossroad, 1982.

  • Moyaert, Paul (2000).  “On Faith and the Experience of Transcendence: An Existential Reflection on Negative Theology.”  In  I. N. Bulhof and L. ten Kate, eds., Flight of the Gods: Philosophical Perspectives on Negative Theology.  New York: Fordham University Press, 2000, pp. 375-383


  • Cattermole, H. (2003). "ISR Editorial."  Interdisciplinary Science Reviews 28:4, p. 233.

  • Crease, R. (2004).  "The Paradox of Trust in Science."  Physics World, March, p. 18.
    ____.  "Fallout: Issues in the Study, Treatment, and Reparations of Exposed Marshall Islanders."
    ____.  (2000) "Case of the Deadly Strangelets."  Physics World, July.
    ____.  (2000). "A Top Ten for Science and Society."  Physics World, December, 17.

  • Fairchild, A. and Bayer, R. (1999).  “Uses and Abuses of Tuskegee,” Science 284.

  • Gooday, G. (2004).  The Morals of Measurement: Accuracy, Irony, and Trust in Late Victorian Electrical Practice.  Cambridge: Cambridge University Pr.

  • Krige, J. (2001).  “Distrust and Discovery: The Case of the Heavy Bosons at CERN.”  ISIS 92, p. 517.

  • Markovits, A. and Deutsch, K. (1980) Fear of Science -- Trust in Science: Conditions for Change in the Climate of Opinion.  Cambridge: Oelgeschlager, Gunn & Hain.

  • Stengers, I. (2000).  The Invention of Modern Science.  Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Pr.

  • Whitbeck, Caroline (2004).  “Trust and the Future of Research.”  Physics

Technology and Society

  • Boholm, A.; J. Bayer, R. Lofsted, and D. Sauri (n.d., coordinating group), "Trust and Community Building after Times of Pollution Catastrophe: Examining the Cases in Four European Communities."

  • Bradbury, J., K. Branch and W. Focht (2000).  "Trust and Public Participation in Rick Policy Issues," in G. Cvetkovich and R. Lofstedt, eds., Social Trust and the Management of Risk. London: Earthscan.

  • Covello, V. (1992).  "Trust and Credibility in Risk Communication." Health and Environment Digest 6:1-3.

  • Crease, R. (1999).  "Conflicting Interpretations of Risk: The Case of Brookhaven's Spent Fuel Rods." Technology 6, 495-500.

  • Earle, T. and Cvetkovich, G. (1995).  Social Trust: Toward a Cosmopolitan Society. Westport: Praeger.

  • Fukuyama, F. (1996).  Trust:  The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity. New York: Free Press.

  • Gambetta, D. ed.  (1988).  Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Kasperson, R., D. Golding, and S. Tuler (1992).  “Social Distrust as a Factor in Siting Hazardous Facilities and Communicating Risks.”  Journal of Social Issues 48: 161-187.

  • Lewis, J. and A. Weigert (1985).  “Trust as a Social Reality.”  Social Forces 63: 967-85.

  • Misztal, B. (1996).  Trust in Modern Societies.  Cambridge: Polity Press.

  • Peters, R., V. Covello, and McCallum, D. (1997).  “The Determinants of Trust and Credibility in Environmental Risk Communication: An Empirical Study.”  Risk Analysis 17: 43-54.

  • Porter, T.  (1995).  Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life.  Princeton: Princeton University Pr.

  • Putnam, R. (2000).  Bowling Alone:  The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon and Schuster.
    ______.     (1993).  Making Democracy Work.  Princeton: Princeton University Press.

  • Renn, O. and D. Levine (1991).  “Credibility and Trust in Risk Communication: An Empirical Study.”  In Communicating Risks to the Public: International Perspectives, ed. R. Kasperson and P. Stallen, pp. 175-218.  Boston: Kluwer.

  • Rosenthal, L.  (1935).  “The Development of the Use of Expert Testimony,” in Law and Contemporary Problems 2: 406-409.

  • Scholz, J. (1998a). "Adaptive Political Attitudes: Duty, Trust, and Fear as Monitors of Tax Policy" (with Mark Lubell), American Journal of Political Science, 42: 903_920.
    _____.    (1998b). "Trust and Taxpaying: Testing the Heuristic Approach to Collective Action" (with Mark Lubell), American Journal of Political Science, 42: 398_417.

  • Scholz, J., R. Schneider, and M. Lubell, “Study of Ecosystem Agreements,” from web page description: