FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

• General Information
   

  General Information

  • What are online course evaluations?

    In Fall 2010, with Faculty Senate and Provostial approval, Stony Brook adopted an online course evaluation system that began during the Spring 2011 semester. This adoption was preceded by a pilot test of the system in Fall 2010 involving 200 course sections and significant discussion with stakeholder groups across the University.

    At this time, the system is in place for all West campus courses. All undergraduate and graduate courses will be evaluated online, unless department chairpersons designate courses that should not be evaluated (such as dissertation, readings, small seminars, etc.) 

    The system is hosted by an external company which provides an extensive set of services including the survey engine, question banks, pre-created analysis and reports of the survey results, as well as a system for managing survey assignments and email reminders to faculty and students. The system is accessible via any Web browser from any Internet-connected computer.

  • When do evaluations take place?

    Faculty and students will automatically receive email notifications and instructions before and during each of the following events.

    1. Instructors will be given 7-10 days before the evaluation period starts to prepare their own customized questions and add them to the evaluation system.
    2. Student access to the course evaluations will start during the final third of a course (approximately four weeks before for full semester courses), and will end the last day of the official final examination period. Students will receive multiple email reminders during this period if at least one course evaluation remains uncompleted.

     
  • Who is evaluated with online course evaluations?

    All instructors and teaching assistants listed as primary and secondary instructors in PeopleSoft/SOLAR are evaluated. If a faculty member manages a course, but does not teach it, he or she should be listed in the SUP field in PeopleSoft to prevent an evaluation being assigned. It is very important that instructor information for courses be correct in PeopleSoft prior to the beginning of each evaluation period or faculty may not get evaluated or the wrong instructor may be evaluated for a course.

  • Are TAs evaluated?

    All instructional staff who are assigned as Primary Instructors or Secondary Instructors are evaluated, including TAs.  It is important for academic departments to enter TA teaching assignments accurately and in a timely manner in order for the course evaluations to be accurately assigned, usually within the first 4 weeks of the semester. If your courses are not listed or you are listed as teaching the wrong course, please contact your department administrator to make the changes in SOLAR and contact TLT to make corrections in the course evaluation system:   CourseEval@stonybrook.edu

  • How are course evaluations assigned?

    Evaluations are assigned based on the data entered by departmental staff in SOLAR. Please contact the appropriate staff member in your department to ensure that your correct teaching assignments are up to date before each semester's evaluation period begins. If you are assigned an evaluation for a course that you are not teaching or have not been assigned to a course that you are teaching, please contact the person in your department who is responsible for maintaining faculty teaching assignments in Peoplesoft/SOLAR. That person is the only person who can contact the course evaluation team to authorize a change in the evaluation assignments.

  • Are small enrollment courses evaluated?

    Yes, policies and procedures determined all courses including low enrollment will automatically be evaluated except those designated as TUTorial or SUPervisory or CLN (clinical).  

    However, faculty and departments can choose to evaluate these courses by submitting an exception request.   To access the exception form, log on at:  it.stonybrook.edu/services/course-evaluations-faculty/exception-request  and authenticate with your Net ID and password.

  • How are team-taught classes handled?

    The system administers separate evaluations for all instructors in the course. Common questions such as those focused on the learning space are delivered only one time to each student within each course.

  • What is a mid-semester formative assessment?

    Quite often, it is useful to receive feedback from a large number of students early enough in the semester to make mid-course adjustments to improve the student learning experience. 

    You may want to administer a two-question survey which asks students:

    • What does your instructor do particularly well? and,
    • What could the instructor do better?

    The mid-semester survey is used as a formative assessment designed solely to provide information and feedback to an instructor and to allow for development and improvement of a course in progress.

    At the faculty member's request, the Faculty Center assessment experts can work with you to address any critical issues arising from the survey. The research literature shows that using a mid-semester survey to solicit student feedback as a formative assessment process provides students with the confidence that their voice in the learning process is valued by the professor and the University, and generally results in higher end-of-semester course evaluations.

    The University of Virginia provides an excellent example of this research:

    "Although the primary purpose for student perception data collected through mid-term and end-of-course evaluations is for course improvement, the two differ slightly. End-of-course evaluation data is a type of summative assessment. Though helpful "next time," summative assessments typically happen too far down the learning path to provide information at the classroom level and to make instructional adjustments and interventions during the learning process. In contrast, mid-term feedback is a type of formative assessment. Formative assessments provide information needed to adjust teaching and learning while they are happening. Research has shown that the benefits of collecting mid-term feedback is especially effective when it is part of a faculty development program that includes personal consultation."

    Cohen, P.A. (1980). Effectiveness of student-rating feedback for improving college instruction: A meta-analysis of findings. Research in Higher Education, 13, 321-341.

  • Who do I contact for technical support with online course evaluations?

    Technical support regarding login, navigation, incorrect instructor assignments, adding custom questions, downloading reports/data, and interpreting results is available to all users. Please contact The Faculty Center at (631) 632-2780 or  CourseEval@stonybrook.edu  for details.

• About the Evaluations
   

  About the Evaluations

  • What questions are on the survey?

    1. Overall, I would give this course a grade of... [A-F, 5-point scale]

    2. The instructor was effective in teaching the subject matter [5-point scale SA(5) -SD(1)].

    3. Instructor expectation of students is reasonable. [5-point scale: SA(5) to SD(1)]

    4. The grading was based on the requirements stated in the syllabus. 

        [Scale: Agree / Grading did not match the syllabus / There was no syllabus / I did not read the syllabus / I don’t know]. 

    5. The textbook, readings and required resources were valuable. 

        [Scale: Agree / Disagree / I did not read the required materials / No text, readings or resources were required]. 

    6. Did the use of the required textbooks, readings or resources sufficiently justify their cost?

        [Scale: Agree / Sufficiently used but not worth the cost / Not sufficiently used / No cost required / I  did not read the required     materials]. 

    7. What is your reason for taking this course? 

        [Scale: DEC* requirement / Major requirement / Minor requirement / Upper-division credit / Personal interest / Other (please specify)]. 

    (* DEC may be replaced with Gen Ed or other term for Stony Brook Curriculum general education course.)

    8. What is the most effective way to contact the instructor outside of class? 

        [Scale: Office Hours / Before or After Class / Email / Telephone / I Never Contacted the Instructor / Other (please specify)]. 

    9. On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of class? 

        [Scale: 0-3 hours / 4-6 hours / 7-9 hours / 10+ hours].

    10. My anticipated grade in this class is: 

        [Scale: A,B,C,D,F,P,S,U, I Don’t Know]

    11. How often did you attend this class? 

        [Scale: Always  /Most of the time / About half the time / Before exams / Very infrequently].

    12. What, if anything, did you find most valuable about this course? (Open)

    13. In what ways, if any, could the course be improved? (Open) 

  • Can I add my own custom questions on course evaluations?
      Yes, faculty can their own questions.  These questions appear at the end of the evaluation. If you would like to know how to add custom questions to your course sections, click   here . 
  • Why did Stony Brook change the online course evaluation form?
    A faculty commitee was formed to revise the course evaluation process, primarily to provide more timely feedback that faculty could use to improve the quality of instruction. Department administrators were asking to update the process because it had become a very resource and time-intensive process. The committee conducted a thorough review of the paper-based system and evaluated a number of online survey options, including a home-grown approach. Our research indicated that the most cost-effective option that would meet faculty, student, and administrator needs was the Online Course Evaluation system that we now have in place.
• Evaluation Results
   

  Evaluation Results

  • How can I have a comment removed from my evaluation?

    Faculty are able to review their own evaluation reports, including student comments, before they are published to the university community, by logging into Campus Labs: 

    https://stonybrook.campuslabs.com/faculty .   

    After reviewing student feedback from the evaluation reports, faculty may request redaction of any comments that harass, threaten, defame, slander or otherwise fall outside the scope of the course by submitting a request to the department chair. If the chair determines the comment/s require further review, they may forward the request to:

    The Vice Provost for Undergraduate Education at  Charles.Robbins@stonybrook.edu or
    The Interim Vice Provost for Graduate Education 
    at Richard.Gerrig@stonybrook.edu

    Student comments will be considered for redaction if they:

    • Appear to evaluate the instructor on criteria not related to her/his teaching performance and/or on a discriminatory basis (see the University's Non-Discrimination Statement:   http://www.stonybrook.edu/policy/policies.shtml?ID=105)
    • Raise allegations of professional impropriety (including harassment or discrimination) on the part of the instructor
    • Include threats of violence. Such allegations may be referred to appropriate University authorities for investigation.

    Comments referred to the Vice Provosts for evaluation will be reviewed and the instructor and their chairperson will be notified of any determination made. 

  • What are the course evaluation completion rates?

    Administration Name	Evaluations to be Completed	Evaluations Completed	Response Rate
    2016	Fall	114,661	57739	50.36%
    	Summer Session I	6,723	2,068	30.76%
    	Summer Session (Extended)	1,776	419	23.59%
    	Summer Session II	7,064	1,905	26.97%
    	Spring	103,305	45,508	44.05%
    2015	Fall	111,181	55,551	49.96%
    	Summer Session I	7,271	2,237	30.77%
    	Summer Session I (Extended)	1,562	480	30.73%
    	Summer Session II	6,839	1,788	26.14%
    	Spring	103,276	47,868	46.35%
    2014	Fall	109,972	50,950	43.33%
    	Summer Session I	7,207	2,168	30.08%
    	Summer Session I (Extended)	1,272	335	26.34%
    	Summer Session II	113	57	50.44%
    	Summer Session II (Extended)	5,886	1,964	33.37%
    	Spring	104,442	43,995	42.09%
    	Winter	2,389	690	28.88%
    2013	Fall	107,730	71,094	38.15%
    	Summer Session I	8,051	1,831	22.74%
    	Summer Session I (Extended)	727	82	11.28%
    	Summer Session II	6,067	1,294	21.33%
    	Summer Session II (Extended)	689	51	7.4%
    	Spring	199,751		26%
    	Winter	2,241	302	13.48%
    2012	Fall			25%
    	Summer	16,107	3,920	24.34%
    	Spring	96,597	25,534	26.43%
    	Winter	2,358	570	24.17%
    2011	Fall	102,390	33,436	32.66%
    	Summer	17,871	2,817	15.76%
    	Spring	98,907	25,619	25.90%

     
  • How do I view evaluation results?

    Course evaluation results will be emailed to faculty and approved reviewers one month after the survey end date. More extensive reports and analysis tools will be available at that time on the  course evaluation website . Approved reviewers can access the evaluation results of all the faculty within a department and generally tend to be department chairs or their designees. Should chairs wish to designate additional reviewers they should email a request which includes the reviewer's Net Id to  CourseEval@stonybrook.edu

  • How can I see my ratings?

    The evaluation data is made available approximately one month after the evaluation period ends to ensure that all grades have been submitted. While the Registrar's grade submission guidelines ask for grades to be submitted 72 hours after final exams, many faculty do not submit grades for several weeks. Consequently, results are delayed until the Registrar indicates that all grades have been submitted. We are working with the course evaluation vendor to develop a means by which faculty can see their own results once they have submitted their grades.

  • How long will the data remain online?

    The evaluation data will remain online as long as the University maintains its contract with this vendor. Each semester, all Stony Brook results are exported and stored in the data warehouse along with all previous course evaluation results so that faculty course summaries will always be available.

  • Why is the evaluation data being made available to students?

    When the online system was being considered by faculty, conversations were conducted with student government and they told us that many students rely on public "rate-my-professor" websites to make course decisions and expressed instead the desire to see Stony Brook's instructor ratings to make informed course choices. Subsequently, the University Faculty Senate approved a motion to make course evaluation data available to students who had completed all of their evaluations. At this time, students will only have access to the ratings for the questions; they do not have access to the comments.

  • What are student response rates?

    The online course evaluation system eliminates a lot of survey loss due to incorrect student and course IDs entered on the paper based forms and from lost forms. Although nationally the response rate is lower for an online system when compared with paper, during the pilot study and first semester in use at Stony Brook the number of returned valid forms was the same for the two systems. 

    Faculty reminders to students during class meetings are critical to keeping response rates high. For additional tips on how to  improve course evaluation results using feedback from your students and to increase response rates , please visit our site or contact the Faculty Center for individual assistance.

    What will happen to response rates if the evaluation is online?

    With the paper instrument the campus response rate (of useable response forms) was effectively 70% and we are working toward meeting and exceeding that response rate for the online system. In a pilot conducted in Fall 2010 with 250 course sections, the response rate was 53%; however that has dropped to 43% in Spring 2011 and 36% in Fall 2011 as the system was implemented on the West, Southampton and Manhattan campuses (the Health Sciences on East campus were not included in the initial implementation). Data from other universities suggest that when moving to an online system the response rates do initially drop, however an increase is seen as students use the system from freshman through senior years and online course evaluations become a cultural norm. Several studies have also shown that the best way to encourage your students to respond is to share with them why their feedback is important to you and what you do with the information. Most students don't believe faculty even read the evaluations and report that they would be more likely to complete the online course evaluations if they believed they were read and used for improving teaching and education on campus.

    What is Stony Brook doing to improve response rates?

    The University is exploring several options to encourage students to complete their course evaluations, including offering random prize drawings and making the evaluation responses available for students who complete all of their evaluations. While the idea of requiring students to complete the evaluations has been considered, research suggests that while response rates may increase, the quality of the data declines. Since implementing the online system, faculty have reported that the quality of the feedback they receive in the written comments has improved.

  • How can I improve my course evaluation response rates?

    Listed here are tried-and-true ways to increase response rates to your course surveys. If you have other ideas or suggestions that have worked for you, please let us know! Email the TLT Course Evaluation Team at   CourseEval@stonybrook.edu

    Getting Response Rates Tip 1:

    It would be very helpful if you set aside five minutes at the beginning of class to speak with students about the evaluation process. Mentioning the following items will greatly increase your chances of success:
    Tell students that the evaluation period has begun.
    Give students a few specific examples of how you used feedback from past course evaluations. For example: "Last semester the evaluations said I should make better use of the course website, and that is why this year I have been posting notes online."
    Tell students that their responses are completely anonymous, and that teachers will only see results after grades are released.
    Going over this information at the start of the evaluation period will set the stage for a strong response rate in your class and for the university as a whole.
    It is important to help students understand that their feedback is greatly valued by you personally, as well as by the school. So, as you are able, please remind your students to complete their course evaluations.

    Getting Response Rates Tip 2:

    As an instructor you can email your students from our system! The email will be sent only to students in all of your classes who have not completed their evaluations. The emails will be anonymous, so you will not know who they are being sent to. This provides an excellent way for students to understand how important it is to complete their evaluations. To edit the emails, click on Email Students in the header menu.

    Getting Response Rates Tip 3:

    Print out reminders that you can hand out to students in class.

    Getting Response Rates Tip 4:

    You can keep the students aware of their progress by just writing the response rates on the board at the beginning of each class. This takes a lot of the pressure off of you reminding them. You could also project the response rates for all your classes using the data below and have a competition between classes for the highest response rate.

    Getting Response Rates Tip 5:

    Let the students know they can complete the surveys on their smartphones using the URL:   https://www.stonybrook.edu/evaluate