< Back to Program List
Graduate: Political Science
- Program Overview
The Ph.D. program in Political Science, in the College of
Arts and Sciences, is characterized by several distinct features:
A. Three areas of specialization
Political Economy and Public Policy
B. Close student/faculty interaction
C. An emphasis on professional training of research-oriented
students and the production of professional-quality articles and conference
papers by Ph.D. students.
The doctoral concentration in political psychology/behavior
applies contemporary psychological theories, concepts, and research methods to
the study of political behavior. Students are trained in topics and methods
associated with psychology as well as political science. Methodological
concerns focus on experimentation and survey research. In addition to formal
training in methods appropriate to the psychological study of political behavior,
students are apprenticed to ongoing research projects throughout their course
of training. Students become familiar with the department’s extensive and
well-equipped laboratories and the regular subject pool. Opportunities are also
available to take part in ongoing survey research projects.
substantive interests of the faculty in this area include voter decision-making
processes, political socialization, political values and beliefs, the mass
media, political cognition, group influence, and public opinion.
Political Economy and Public Policy
The concentration in political economy and public policy
emphasizes the interaction between politics and the institutions (both public
and private) that shape economic policies. Students choosing this concentration
analyze important issues by focusing on decision-making and organizational
behavior as shaped by individual incentives and institutional structures. In
addition to the foundation course in public policy required of all students,
elective seminars in this field include policy evaluation, organizational
decision-making, bureaucracy, regulation, institutional analysis, and urban
The faculty have published research
on issues such as the economic development of metropolitan areas, the political
economy of suburbs, political controls over regulatory bureaucracies, and
citizen responses to tax policies. A sample of other ongoing research projects
in which incoming students may become involved include the effect of
market-like incentives in school choice, subsidy flows in the European Union,
the role of social capital in environmental decision making, and regulation of
business by state governments. The economic approach is also used to
investigate other political processes such as voting, party competition, and
The American politics concentration provides a broad
perspective on national political institutions and processes, with particular
emphases on elections and courts. Courses focusing on political parties and
elections, the legislative process, the American judiciary, electoral behavior,
American political ideology, and public choice theory are offered. Students
become familiar with the kinds of quantitative and formal analysis techniques
most often applied to the study of American politics. Seminar papers allow
students to go into detail on topics of special interest.
of the faculty are currently doing research on congressional and Supreme Court
decision-making, the role of economic forces in American national elections,
voting in congressional elections, issues of gender and the law, and the
dynamics of American public opinion.
Since we believe that a strong background in research
methods is essential for political scientists interested in empirical research,
we provide a rigorous training in the application of statistical methods and
formal models to political analysis. Coursework in methods includes
introductory training in research design and elementary statistics, as well as
more advanced work in statistical analysis, econometrics, time series analysis,
and measurement. The department recognizes that many undergraduates in
political science come to graduate school without much background in statistics
and math. Therefore, our courses start at an introductory level and slowly
develop the skills necessary to do publishable research in political science.
In addition to the classroom work, these courses all involve analysis of actual
data on personal computers. We believe, however, that it is the application of
research methods, first as part of faculty and class research projects and then
in a student’s own dissertation research, that makes a qualified researcher
with the skills required for success in research and academic careers.
Leonie Huddy, (631) 632-7639
Graduate Program Director
Carri Horner, Ward Melville Social and Behavioral Sciences Building S-703 (631) 632-7667
M.A. in Political Science; Ph.D. in Political Science
The Department of Political Science Doctoral Program admits
only students who intend to complete the Ph.D., although students are eligible
to receive the M.A. Applicants for admission to the Ph.D. program in political
science must meet the following requirements:
A. Submission of Graduate Record Examination (GRE) Test
scores (verbal, quantitative, and analytic).
B. Prior training that includes basic work in at least two
of the following:
Mathematics or statistics
Economics or sociology
C. A bachelor’s degree with at least a B average in the
D. Three letters of recommendation from instructors or
E. In those cases where the departmental admissions
committee deems it desirable, personal interviews with departmental
representatives may be necessary.
Acceptance by both the Department of Political Science and
the Graduate School is required.
- Degree Requirements
In addition to the minimum requiremetns of the Graduate School, the Department requires all candidates to complete 30 credits of approved graduate coursework in which a grade of B or higher has been received.
Candidates must meet the general requirements for the Ph.D. degree set by the Graduate School. Departmental requirements are as follows:
A. Core Courses
Students take four core courses:
1. POL 600 Research Project
2. POL 601 Public Policy and Political Economy
3. POL 605 American Government
4. POL 608 Political Psychology
Students are expected to master the methods necessary to engage in scholarly work:
1. All students take a three-course sequence in mathematics, statistics, and research methods (POL 602, POL 603, POL 604).
2. All students are required to take at least one advanced methods course either in this department or in a cognate field (e.g., economics). The student’s choice of advanced elective(s) is decided in conjunction with the student’s advisor.
3. In addition to requirements 1 and 2 above, political psychology students take POL 610, a graduate-level course in experimental design. Political economy and American Politics students must take POL 613, Game Theory.
4. Students who have attended the ICPSR Summer Program in Quantitative Methods at the University of Michigan can have the advanced elective requirement waived.
Students take a minimum of four advanced seminars in their area of specialization and three in their minor area. The seminars are typically at the 600 level and can be within the department or can be in cognate fields such as psychology, economics, or applied math. The course of study is selected by the student in consultation with his or her advisor and must be approved by the graduate program director.
D. Teaching and Research Apprenticeship
To ensure that all students become proficient in teaching and research, students work with the faculty on an individual basis. Funded students participate in faculty research projects and assist in teaching courses. Advanced students then prepare and teach their own undergraduate classes.
Graduate students in the Ph.D. program are formally evaluated at the end of each semester, based on grades received in the program and on evaluations by faculty familiar with the student’s work.
The evaluation committee’s charge is to make one of the following three possible determinations with regard to the student’s progress: (1) recommend continuation of graduate study toward the Ph.D., (2) recommend that the student be allowed to continue toward a terminal M.A. but not to continue in the Ph.D. program, or (3) recommend that the student not be permitted to enroll in additional graduate courses in the department.
The evaluation also serves as the basis for the decision as to whether the student is to receive financial support during subsequent semesters of graduate work.
F. Qualifying Examinations
1. Timing of Examinations: Students making normal progress toward the Ph.D. should anticipate taking qualifying examinations following the second year of coursework. Examinations in three fields compose the doctoral qualifying examinations.
2. Examination Fields: The department’s policy is to allow students to take exams only in those areas in which its faculty strengths allow in-depth training, including:
b. American Politics
c. Political Economy and Public Policy
d. Political Psychology/Behavior
All students are required to take the methods exam. Students then prepare two of the three other substantive areas for written examination.
3. Preparation and Evaluation of Examinations: The graduate program director appoints a committee (with a designated committee chairperson) responsible for each examination field. The committee prepares the written examination, providing sufficient options for questions on which students may write. The committee members read the student’s examination and prepare an evaluation of that performance, which is reviewed by the Ph.D. committee.
Following successful completion of the qualifying examinations, the student begins the process of preparing his or her dissertation.
The third year includes developing a directed reading course under the supervision of a dissertation director. Through the readings the student will explore specialized research literature in the area of a proposed dissertation, develop an initial bibliography, and formulate a specific question for research. The second half of the year includes working with the dissertation director and selecting a dissertation committee consisting of four faculty members—three from the Department of Political Science and one with whom the student has worked outside of the department. The third year culminates with a presentation of the dissertation proposal by the student and its acceptance by the dissertation committee.
Should the dissertation committee reject the proposal, a candidate is allowed to revise the proposal for a subsequent defense. If this second defense also results in failure, the student’s program is terminated.
Upon successful conclusion of research, the student defends the completed dissertation to the committee and the University community at large.
The required courses for first-year students are given every year; electives are generally offered every other year. Courses are open to qualified students from other programs with permission of the graduate program director.
Electives: American Politics
Electives: Public Policy
Electives: Political Psychology
The department has extensive research facilities equal to
any in the country, most located on the same floor with faculty and student
offices. Students routinely use the conveniently located computer facilities
for writing and analysis as part of their professional training. The Social and
Behavioral Sciences Data Laboratory on our floor provides access to
state-of-the-art personal computers tied to a local computer network and
providing connections to all computers on campus. The Stony Brook Instructional
Networked Computer site one floor below the department provides additional
personal computers for classroom and research work. In addition, our data lab
maintains a library of reference materials, holds classes on specific software
packages, provides access to the extensive data archives available through the
Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Resources, and employs
computer consultants to help with student research projects. All of the
resources of the data lab are available to graduate students.
laboratories for political psychology research are designed for the
experimental study of political behavior. One set of labs contains computerized
equipment to monitor, control, record, and analyze multiple responses from subjects.
Much of the recent work focuses on information processing and
decision-making—how citizens interpret, use, and recall political information.
The other set of labs contains a large survey and experiment room equipped with
computerized data collection stations . Students may also take advantage of our
modern, fully equipped Survey Center for public opinion studies using
computer-assisted, telephone interviewing.
Lodge, Milton G., Emeritus, Ph.D., 1967, University of Michigan: Political psychology; political cognition.
Segal, Jeffrey A., Chairperson, Ph.D., 1983, Michigan State University: Judicial process and behavior; research methods; American politics.
Myers, Frank, Emeritus, Ph.D., 1965, Columbia University: Comparative politics; political theory.
Barabas, Jason, Ph.D. 2000, Northwestern University: American politics, methodology, public policy.
Feldman, Stanley, Ph.D., 1978, University of Minnesota: American politics, emphasizing political psychology and socialization; public opinion; voting behavior and participation; methodology.
Huddy, Leonie, Ph.D., 1987, University of California, Los Angeles: Political attitudes; groups and politics; sociopolitical gerontology; women and politics.
Jerit, Jennifer, Ph.D. 2002, University of Illinois: Political psychology, citizen competence, media effects, persuasion, political rhetoric.
Koppelman, Lee E., Emeritus, D.P.A., 1970, New York University: Comprehensive regional and urban planning; environmental policy; American federalism and intergovernmental relations; regional policy analysis; coastal zone planning.
Lebo, Matthew, Ph.D., 1999, University of North Texas: Political parties; public opinion; elections; political methodology.
Norpoth, Helmut, Ph.D., 1974, University of Michigan: Electoral behavior; public opinion
Lahav, Gallya, Ph.D., 1995, City University of New York: Political psychology; comparative politics.
Kline, Reuben, Ph.D. 2010, University of California-Irvine: Behavioral political economy, fairness, social preferences, climate change mitigation, corruption.
Krupnikov, Yanna, Ph.D., 2009, University of Michigan: Political psychology, political communication, political persuasion, political behavior, empirical methodology.
Smirnov, Oleg, Ph.D., 2005, University of Oregon: Evolutionary game theory; computational and agent-based modeling; experimental economics; evolutionary psychology.
Peress, Michael, Ph.D. 2006, Carnegie Mellon University: Voting behavior, legislative institutions, electoral systems, methodology, formal theory.
Ryan, John, Ph.D., 2009, University of California-Davis: Political communication, social networks, campaigns, voting behavior.
Delton, Andrew, Ph.D., 2010, University of California-Santa Barbara: Evolutionary psychology, behavioral economics, cooperation and altruism, social cognition.
DeScioli, Peter, Ph.D., 2008, University of Pennsylvania: Evolutionary psychology, behavioral economics, morality, alliances.
Vittorio E. Merola Marotta, Ph.D. 2016, Ohio State University: Voting behavior, attitudes about inequality, redistribution, and immigration.
Nam, Hannah, Ph.D., 2016, New York University: Political psychology, neuro-cognitive correlates of political ideology, system justification, public opinion.
Sawyer, Katherine, Ph.D. 2017, University of Maryland: Civil conflict, rebellion movements, leaders and organizational dynamics, methodology.
Julian J. Wamble, Ph.D. 2017, University of Maryland: Race and ethnic politics, political psychology, survey methodology.
Number of teaching, graduate, and research assistants, fall 2009: 22