Arts and Science Senate

Undergraduate Curriculum Committee

Academic Year 2002-2003

21st  meeting, 15 May 2003--  Minutes approved on 9/3/03

 

Present: R. Cerrato, chair, S. Sternglanz, N. Tomes, A. Feldman, C. Marrone, E. Kaplan, C. Promin, A. Hasloecher, K. Breidenbach, secretary

 

I.                   Committee Business

Minutes of the meeting of 24 April 2003

The minutes were approved.

 

II.                Routine Administrative Matters

HUR 241 Russian Cinema 

The request to change the course description was approved.

 

Changes in course titles were approved for:

WST 111-G Introduction to Queer Studies in the Humanities

WST 112-F Introduction to Queer Studies in the Social Sciences

 

III.             New Business

ARH 3##-G Public Art and Urban Design in New York City—new course proposal

While everyone agreed the course sounded excellent and would be attractive to students, there was some question about creating a regular standing course that would only be offered every three years at best. Members recommended the course be offered as a topics course when it is offered. In addition, there was concern about the number of meeting hours. Cerrato said the excursions sounded more like fieldwork than lecture time. Breidenbach would communicate with the department. [Note: the instructor indicated that the fieldtrips really are conducted as lecture/seminars, because she lectures the entire time. Kaplan will ensure that the course is scheduled for the appropriate number of hours.]

 

AFS 3##-H Aids, Race and Gender in the Black Communitynew course proposal

Sternglanz noted that “gender” is mentioned in the course title but nowhere in the description. Also, while members thought the idea of offering the course as satisfying DEC H was interesting, they noted that the H-ness needed to be more apparent in the description and syllabus. Tomes offered to speak with the instructor to help her craft the description appropriately. Breidenbach recommended changing the proposed prerequisites to U3 or U4 standing with an advisory prerequisite of one biology course. The course was approved with the assumption that the description would be changed.

 

BIO 103 Modern Issues in Biologynew experimental course proposal

Members said the title seemed misleading, especially as the issues seemed to be limited to biotechnology rather than all of biology. Hasloecher  said that she had thought the course was going to be a discussion about issues, but the course syllabus doesn’t bear that out. There was also concern about the number of meeting hours because  of the planned number of minilabs. There would be 7 1/2 hours of lab and since labs are supposed to meet for 3 hours a week per one credit hour, the course essentially would fall a week and a half short of meeting the requisite number of hours.  Either the course needs to have some additional scheduled meeting time or the course should be offered for fewer credits. The course was approved, since it is experimental. Breidenbach would communicate with the department.

 

IV.              Old Business

BIO 318 Bioethics and Policy—new course proposal

Given the additional information provided by the department, the course was approved.

 

V.                 Other Business

General Education 

Cerrato outlined his proposal for how general education courses should be handled on the campus and submitted to Albany. He said the SUNY form would be prepared by the committee secretary and submitted electronically to the campus provost or deputy provost who would then send it on to Albany. If the course is rejected by SUNY and sent to ACGE, the curriculum committee would communicate with the department and instructor about whether they want to submit additional information. The line of communication would be department/faculty to curriculum committee to Stony Brook provost to SUNY provost or ACGE and vice versa.  Cerrato said he’s discussed this issue with the senate executive committee and that he believes it’s important for the senate to acknowledge and deal with the fact that, if we participate in this process, we are accepting the fact that the local campus does not have the final authority for approval of courses toward general education requirements.  Cerrato said he would try to set up a meeting of the provost, the two senate presidents, the chair of the undergraduate council, himself and the committee secretary.

 

Feldman noted that we will begin to see problems with the issue of transferring courses toward general education/DEC requirements. She distributed a draft SUNY GER and transfer policy memo which indicates that campuses must accept other school’s general education courses toward the general education requirement. She said thus far students are accepting the fact that they have to take a DEC K course here when they’ve satisfied the American history requirement elsewhere, but she said this is going to become more and more difficult.

 

The meeting was adjourned.