Section
18
Data/Tissue Registries
Revised January 2004
*** FOR DATA REGISTRIES, SECTION 25 MUST BE REVIEWED FOR NEW PRIVACY RULE ('HIPAA') IMPLICATIONS ***
Mandated Database/Tissue Registries: defined as databases or registries that are required by a state or federal governmental agency. These activities are not under IRB jurisdiction, and specific research consent is not required. However, the IRB does have jurisdiction over any SBU investigator-proposed research use of identifiable and primary (i.e., not aggregate/anonymous) data/specimens from such mandated entities. |
Non-mandated Tissue Registries: defined as a tissue repository not required by a state or federal governmental agency. These activities are under IRB jurisdiction. See section 19 for issues to be considered when applying for approval from CORIHS. |
Non-Mandated Databases/Data Registries: |
(Note: CORIHS approval is required before SBU QA data are prepared for publication and/or presentation outside the University. See section 1, ”Stony Brook University Definitions’) |
If there is any intent of the database/data registry to provide data for future use in research activities, IRB approval is required in order for an investigator to submit data to such entities. IRB approval will be solely for the activity of data submission to the entity, i.e., the ‘banking’ of the data. Future use of the data for research purposes will be subject to further regulatory review by the researchers’ specific IRB. |
The type of data, as well as the identifiers linked to the data, will necessarily impact upon:
|
Return to Human Subjects Research at SBU Last Updated: 2004-04-28 |