Environmental Defense Collection
Manuscript Collection 232

Record Group 4 - Berkeley/California Office

Sub-group I: Administrative
Sub-group II: Energy/Climate
Sub-group III: Water
Sub-group IV: Environmental Health/Toxics
Sub-group V: Transportation

Sub-group I.1: Administrative--Regional Counsels   

SERIES 1:  Thomas J. Graff

Box 1

Writings:
Graff, T. J. (1976). [Untitled op-ed piece on environmentalism and the Brown
            Administration]. Manuscript.

Graff, T. J. (1978). Environment and states’ rights:  Alignments in transition.
            Manuscript.

Graff, T.J. (1978, October 9). The controversy over resources: is secession the only
answer? The National Law Journal, pp. 21-23.

Graff, T.J. (1978, December 18). The controversy over NEPA and the filing of
            environmental impact statements. The National Law Journal, pp. 21-22.

Graff, T.J. (1979, November). Stewart and Khier: environmental law and public policy.
            [Book review]. Harvard Law Review, Vol. 93, No. 1, 282-289.

Graff, Thomas J. “Battling Institutional Resistance to the wider use of Alternative Electric Energy
            Generation and Conservation Technologies in the United States.” Address at the World
            Congress: Alternatives and Environment,             Vienna, Austria, October 1979.

Graff, T.J. (1980, September). Environmentalism under a conservative administration.
            Manuscript.

Memoranda, 1971-81
Memoranda: Litigation Review Committee, 1972-81
Memoranda: Programming, 1972-73
Memoranda: Programming, 1975-78
Memoranda: Programming, 1979

Staff meetings: agendas, 1972-73. 1975, 1978

Sub-group I.2 Administrative--Committees

SERIES 1:  Board of Trustees

Box 1

Memoranda, 1972-75, 1977

Annual meeting, November 1979
Annual meeting, April-May, 1980
Annual meeting, November 1980
Annual meeting—minutes, September 1985
Annual meeting—minutes, June 1986

SERIES 2:  Executive Committee of the Board

Box 1

Memoranda, 1972-77

Meeting minutes, 1971
Meeting minutes, 1972
Meeting minutes, 1973
Meeting minutes, 1974
Meeting minutes, 1975
Meeting minutes, 1976
Meeting minutes, 1977
Meeting minutes, January 1979
Meeting agenda and program, June 22, 1979
Meeting agenda and program, November 16, 1979
Meeting agenda and program, February 22, 1980
Meeting agenda and program, November 14, 1980
Meeting agenda and program, May 1, 1981
Meeting agenda and program, September 1981
Meeting agenda and program, June 1984
Meeting agenda and program, September 1984

Sub-group I.3: Administrative—Public Information/Communications
Series note: Series 1, 2 and 3 are filed in the same box

SERIES 1:  Press Releases

Box 1

1971-72
1973
1974
1975
1976
1983-84

SERIES 2:  Inter-Office Bulletins

Berkeley office weekly bulletin:
1972-73, with gaps
1974
1975
1976
1977
1978-79
1983-84

SERIES 3:  Film and Television

“Desert in Peril” (film script), 1974

“Planning for Floods” memoranda, 1973-75
“Planning for Floods” contracts, 1973

“Last Days of the Dolphin”:
Memoranda, 1974-76
Memoranda: copyright, 1976
Film proposal, 1974
Contracts, n.d.
Film script, n.d.
Premiere programs, n.d.

Box 2

Fairness Doctrine:
Public Service Announcement on power plants (script), ca. 1978
Correspondence regarding the airing of the PSA, 1979
Environmental groups complaint to the FCC, 1980
Media clippings, 1980

Sub-group I.4: Administrative—Fundraising Activities

SERIES 1:  Grant Files

Box 1

Ecosystems for Urban Environments:  A Preliminary Prospectus for public support of the
Environmental Defense Fund’s Urban Action Program, 1972

A proposal to the Ford Foundation for support of EDF’s programs, submitted 1972

A prospectus for population planning, submitted 1972

Proposal to the Compton Foundation from the Environmental Defense Fund, submitted April 1978

Investment Determinants and the Commercialization of Alternative Energy Sources within the
Electric Power Sector:  A Proposal for Policy Research.
Submitted to the Ford Foundation, March 1979

Proposal by the Environmental Defense Fund: Utility Investment Reform Project to the John A. Hartford Foundation, submitted February 1980

Agricultural Water Conservation Project:  Status report to the General Services Foundation,
March 1980

Proposal by the Environmental Defense Fund to the Rockefeller Foundation for Legal and Strategic Analysis of Agricultural Issues, submitted May 1980

Agricultural Water Conservation Project:  Report to the General Services Foundation, April 1981

The Master Drain of Agricultural Wastewater from the Central Valley to the Sacramento/San Joaquin
Delta/Suisan Bay Ecosystem:  A Pre-proposal for Research to the Dean Wittier Foundation,
submitted April 1981

Proposal to the San Francisco Foundation from the Environmental Defense Fund to support of EDF’s
Program to Protect Vital Aquatic Resources in Northern California, submitted May 1981

Proposal to the Columbia Foundation from the Environmental Defense Fund to support of EDF’s program to protect vital aquatic resources in Northern California, submitted May 1981

Proposal to the Ahmanson Foundation from the Environmental Defense Fund, to support EDF’s California Water Resources Program, January 1982

Proposal to the German Marshall Fund of the United States to support EDF’s Energy Program,
March 1982

Progress report to the Abelard Foundation on the grant supporting the Integrated Pest Management Project, May 1982

Research on Financial Aspects of the Electric Utility Industry. Final Report to the Ford Foundation: 1982 activities of the Environmental Defense Fund, June 1982

Pre-Proposal to the W.K. Kellogg Foundation, submitted by the Environmental Defense Fund, for Dissemination of Irrigation Information in Agricultural Communities, submitted December 1982

Irrigation on the Texas High Plains and the Ogallala Aquifer Water Supply:  A Project Proposal by the Environmental Defense Fund, submitted 1982

Proposal to the Abelard Foundation for dissemination and program implementation of California’s pesticide regulations, submitted February 1983

Proposal to the William H. Donner Foundation for support of EDF’s project to promote…solutions to the over drafting of the Ogallala Aquifer in the High Plains Region of Northwest Texas, submitted
April 1983

Irrigation Water Use in California’s San Joaquin Valley: A Research Funding Proposal to the Bank of America from the Environmental Defense Fund, submitted April 1983

Proposal for funding from the Bothin Helping Fund to partially finance a new computer system for EDF’s Berkeley office, submitted September 1983

Proposal to the William H. Donner Foundation from the Environmental Defense Fund to support a project to promote economically efficient measures to control the contamination of groundwater by toxic chemicals in the Los Angeles area, submitted December 1983

A General Support Proposal for the Environmental Defense Fund, January 1984

Tentative Draft Proposal for the Colorado River Basin Project, April 1984

Final Project Report on the Study of Alternatives to the Master Drain, submitted to the San Francisco Foundation, August 1984

Proposal to the Shalan Foundation by the Environmental Defense Fund for support of the Implementation Phase of the “Alternatives to the Master Drain Project” September 1984

Box 2

Proposal to the C.S. Fund from the Environmental Defense Fund and the California Rural Legal
Assistance Foundation, 1982

The economics of water resources development in the western United States: A proposal to the
Kendall Foundation from the Environmental Defense Fund, 1982

Irrigation on the Texas high plains and the Ogallala Aquifer water supply. A project proposal
by the Environmental Defense Fund, 1982.

Final report to the Bothin Helping Fund by the Environmental Defense Fund on use of computer
software in California water resources research, 1982-1983.

Proposal to the William H. Donner Foundation from the Environmental Defense Fund for control
of contamination of groundwater by toxic chemicals in the area of Los Angeles, 1983.

Willey, W.R.Z. (1983). Economic modeling of natural resources and environmental
            processes. Manuscript.

Application for a 1984 Lindbergh Grant for the proposed project, “The impacts of air pollution
on California’s agricultural yields”, 1983.

Proposal to the Michael J. Connell Foundation by the Environmental Defense Fund for an
investigation of potential control measures for toxic chemical contamination of groundwater, 1984.

Proposal to the Shalan Foundation by the Environmental Defense Fund for the implementation
phase of the “Alternatives to the Master Drain Project”, 1984.

Proposal to the San Francisco Foundation from the Environmental Defense Fund for the San
Francisco Bay/Delta Protection Project, 1984.

Proposal to the Michael J. Connell Foundation from the Environmental Defense Fund for research directed at methods for reducing contamination of groundwater by toxic chemicals in one southern
California groundwater basin, 1985.
 
Proposal to the National Science Foundation for preliminary in-depth technology assessment of waste water reclamation conducted under the auspices of the Environmental Defense Fund, draft,
n.d.

SERIES 2:  Electric Horseman Benefit

Box 1

Correspondence, 1979-80
The Electric Horseman premiere publicity clips, 1979
Film benefit invitation
Benefit program
Invitation and sponsor lists
The Electric Horseman movie poster

Sub-group II.1: Energy Program Administration

SERIES 1:  Memoranda

Box 1

Memoranda—Southwest Energy Action Project proposal, 1975
Memoranda—Program planning, 1977
Memoranda—Draft Energy Program report and 1978 highlights
Memoranda—Energy Program meeting, June 20-21, 1979

Sub-group II.2: Energy Program—Legal Papers

SERIES 1: Litigation and Hearing Files

Box 1:  Application of PG&E to Increase Rates for Electric Service Due to Fuel Cost
Adjustments (1974)

Application no. 55522 before the California Public Utilities Commission

Opening statement of the Environmental Defense Fund, October 1974
Transcript of opening statements, Volume 1, October 15, 1974

Transcript of testimony:
Volume 2—John F. Roberts, Jr. on behalf of Pacific Gas & Electric, October 16, 1974
Volume 3—R.P. Benton on behalf of Pacific Gas & Electric, October 31, 1974
Volume 4-- John F. Roberts, Jr. on behalf of Pacific Gas & Electric, November 1, 1974

Exhibits#4-21

Background documents:
Correspondence of Atlantic Richfield Company to Pacific Gas & Electric, 1972-1974
Pacific Gas & Electric. “Outlook: 1975” [report]

Box 2:  Air Pollution Regulation (1974-1975)

Western Oil & Gas Association v. Orange County Air Pollution Control District (Supreme Ct. of Calif)

Pleadings—Briefs:
Western Oil & Gas Association
Environmental Defense Fund (as amicus curiae)

Petition for re-hearing, 1975

Boxes 3-7:  Applications by PG&E to Increase Rates & Charges for Electric, Gas and Steam
                   Services (1974-1975)

Box 3

Application nos. 54279, 54280. 54281 before the California Public Utilities Commission

Correspondence, 1974-1975
Media clippings, 1972-1975

Pleadings:
February-June, 1974
August-September 1974, February 1975
Opening brief of the California Manufacturers’ Association,
Opening brief of the California Portland Cement Company
Opening briefs of the Cities of Palo Alto and San Francisco
Closing brief of EDF
Opening brief of the Federal Energy Commission
Briefs of Pacific Gas & Electric
Opening brief of the Public Utilities Commission of California
Briefs of the Secretary of Defense on behalf of the consumer interests of all executive agencies
Briefs of Toward Utility Rate Normalization (T.U.R.N.)

Box 4

Transcripts of testimony:
Volume 56-Robert J. Budnitz on behalf of the Environmental Defense Fund, November 18, 1974
Volume 57-Richard Sextro on behalf of the Environmental Defense Fund, November 19, 1974
Volume 71-William Vickery on behalf of the Environmental Defense Fund, Jan 21, 1975
Volume 74-Charles Cicchetti on behalf of the Environmental Defense Fund, Jan 27, 1975
Volume 75-Charles Cicchetti on behalf of the Environmental Defense Fund, Jan 28, 1975
Volume 76-Charles Cicchetti on behalf of the Environmental Defense Fund, Jan 29, 1975
Volume 82-William Gallavan on behalf of Pacific Gas & Electric, February 29=0, 1975
Volume 85-Shermer L. Sibley (PG&E) called as an adverse witness by Electricity & Gas for the People Campaign, March 4, 1975

Box 5

Transcripts of testimony:
Volume 86-Nicholas Caravelli called as a witness on his own behalf, March 5, 1975
Volume 86-Shermer L. Sibley
Volume 87-Daniel J. Reed, March 6, 1975

Exhibits:
#2, 4, 6
#31-34, 43-44, 48-50
#61-62, 64, 81-89
#95-96, 110-113, 115

Box 6

Application No. 54279 of PG&E to increase rates and charges for electric service
Application No. 54280 of PG&E to increase rates and charges for gas service

Exhibits:
Pacific Gas & Electric
In support of Application no. 54279
In support of Application no. 54280

Box 7

Exhibits:
#116-117, 123-126
Prepared testimony-witnesses on behalf of the California Farm Bureau Association
Prepared testimony-witnesses on behalf of the Environmental Defense Fund
Prepared testimony-witnesses on behalf of the Fibreboard Corporation
Prepared testimony-witnesses on behalf of Pacific Gas & Electric
Prepared testimony-witnesses on behalf of Toward Utility Rate Normalization

Background documents:
PG&E Print Advertisements
“PG&E Progress” (newsletter), January-September 1974
Research & Development-Edison Electrical Institute Bulletin, November/December 1973
Research & Development-Electrical Power Research Institute-“EPRI News” (newsletter),
Volume II, Nos. 1, 3, 5-6, 1974; Volume III, Nos. 1-2, 1975
Research & Development-EPRI First Annual Report, 1974
Research & Development-EPRI Research Progress Reports, 1974
Research & Development-EPRI Conference Proceedings: “Power Generation: Clean Fuels Today”, April 1974
Research & Development-EPRI testimony before House and Senate Committees, 1975

Boxes 8-9:  California Public Utilities Commission Investigation into Electric Utility Rate
                    Structures No. 9804 (1974-1976)

Application no. 56124 before the Public Utilities Commission of the State of California

Box 8

Correspondence, 1975
Order instituting investigation, October 1974
Presiding officer’s report of pre-hearing conference-supplements, March 1975
Pleadings—briefs, July 1975
Decision no. 85559—opinion & final report to the Legislature pursuant to
Assembly Concurrent Resolution no. 192
Concurring opinion of Commissioners William Symons, Jr. & Vernon L. Sturgeon, March 1976
Pleadings-Petition for re-hearing of Decision no. 85559
Opinion, November 1976

Transcripts of testimony:
Volume 7 (partial)-Bill Press on behalf of Planning and Conservation Foundation, April 16, 1975
Volume 7-Charles Cicchetti on his own behalf
Volume 7-Bruce Smith on his own behalf
Volume 8 (partial)-Ralph Turvey, April 16, 1975

Exhibits—Prepared testimonies

Box 9

Application for authority to change rate schedules pursuant to Second Interim Report in Case no. 9804

Exhibits—Prepared testimonies

Electric Utilities—Forecasting (1975)

Box 10

Public Utilities Commission staff’s ten-year forecast of electric loads and the ERCDC’s Commission’s interim forecast of electric loads and resources. Hearing before the Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission

Transcript of proceedings, August 20, 1975
Transcript of public meeting, August 26, 1975

The California Public Utilities Commission’s report on ten-year forecasts of electric utilities
loads and resources Hearing before the Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission

Transcript of public hearing, August 27, 1975

In the matter of an independent staff analysis of the Public Utilities Commission’s report on
ten-year forecasts of electric utilities loads and resources. Hearing before the Energy Resources
Conservation and Development Commission

Transcript of proceedings, September 2, 1975

Box 10a

The Public Utilities Commission forecast of electric loads and resources and the Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission’s interim forecast of electric loads and resources Docket No. 75 for 5 before the Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission (ERCDC)

Opening statement, June 1975
Opinion of the Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission
Transcripts of proceedings, June 1975

The California Public Utilities Commission public hearing on General Order 131

Transcript of proceedings, July 1975

Presentations of Pacific Gas & Electric and San Diego Gas & Electric on the Commission staff’s 10 year forecast of electric loads and resources & ERCDC’s interim forecast of electric loads and resources, hearings before the Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission

Transcript of proceedings, July 1975

Box 10b

The Public Utilities Commission forecast of electric loads and resources and the Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission’s interim forecast of electric loads and resources Docket No. 75 for 5 before the Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission (ERCDC)

Transcript of proceedings, August 1975
Exhibits—Prepared testimony

Answers to interrogatories of the ERCDC:
Dept of Water Resources
San Diego Gas & Electric
Southern California Edison

Reports on electric loads and forecasts:
By the California Public Utilities Commission
By the City of Los Angeles Department of Water and Power

Box 10c

Reports on electric loads and forecasts:
By the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power
By Southern California Edison

Boxes 11-19:  Application of PG&E to Increase Rates & Charges for Electric Service
                       (1976-1978)

Box 11

Application nos. 55509-10 before the California Public Utilities Commission

Correspondence, 1976-1977

Pleadings—briefs, June 1977
Pleadings—briefs, July 1977
Pleadings, October 1977
Presiding officer’s proposed report, November 1977
Pleadings—exceptions to proposed report, December 1977

Box 12

Pleadings—exceptions to proposed report, December 1977

Decision no. 89315, opinion on Application no. 55509, September 1978
Petitions for re-hearing decision, October 1978
Order modifying decision no. 89315 and denying re-hearing, November 1978

Transcripts of testimony:
Summaries of testimony transcripts, volumes 44-62
Volume 46, John S. Cooper (incomplete), January 27, 1977
Volume 48, John S. Cooper (afternoon session), January 28, 1977
Volume 49, James C. O’Keefe on behalf of Pacific Gas & Electric, February 9, 1977
Volume 50, Barton W. Shackelford, February 10, 1977
Volume 51, Barton W. Shackelford, February 11, 1977

Box 13

Volume 51, Barton W. Shackelford, February 11, 1977
Volume 54, Sproul cross-examination, February 24, 1977
Volume 55, Sproul cross-examination, February 25, 1977
Volume 56, Barton W. Shackelford, March 8, 1977
Volume 58, Barton W. Shackelford, March 10, 1977
Volume 61, John C. Shaeffer on behalf of the Environmental Defense Fund, March 23, 1977
Volume 63, Robert Clear on behalf of the Environmental Defense Fund, March 25, 1977
Volume 63, Philip B. Williams, March 25, 1977
Volume 63, Robert J. Leonard, March 25, 1977
Volume 63, George A. Amaroli, March 25, 1977
Volume 67, Charles Komanoff, April 19, 1977
Volume 68, W.R. Willey on behalf of the Environmental Defense Fund, April 20, 1977
Volume 68, William Gardner on behalf of the Environmental Defense Fund
Transcript of oral arguments, January 1978

Exhibits to testimony:
#2, 4, 11, 20, 27
#23, 27-28

Box 14

Exhibits to testimony:
#31-36
#38
#42, 51-54, 59-60
#79
#91, 97-100
#101-106
#110-115

Box 15

Exhibits to testimony:
#127, 134-140
#146-148
#174-75, 189-196

Exhibits—Prepared testimony:
Witnesses on behalf of the Environmental Defense Fund
Witnesses on behalf of Pacific Gas & Electric

Box 16

Exhibits—prepared testimony:
Witnesses on behalf of Pacific Gas & Electric
Witnesses on behalf of Toward Utility Rate Normalization

Un-numbered exhibits—Pacific Gas & Electric
Un-numbered exhibits—California Public Utilities Commission

Background documents:
Papers associated with Clear testimony (EDF)
Papers associated with Willey testimony (EDF)

Box 17

Amended applications
Exhibits in support of applications

Box 18

Exhibits in support of applications
Exhibits—Environmental Defense Fund

Box 19

Background documents
Papers associated with O’Keefe testimony (PG&E)

Energy Conservation & Development Commission-
Load Management issue paper, March 1976

“Energy Consumption in California: data collection & analysis: A report to the Energy Conservation & Development Commission”, June 1976

”Financing Requirements of the Electric Utility Industry, 1975-1995” Institute of Business & Economic Research UC Berkeley, July 1976

Electrical Pricing Policies [staff report], August 1976

Box 20:  Application of Pacific Gas & Electric for review of conservation programs
  before the Public Utilities Commission (1976-1977)

Application by Pacific Gas and Electric for authority to include in its electric and gas rate tariffs a procedure for Commission Review of Conservation Programs and adjustment of PG&E rates periodically to provide funds for conservation programs, November 1976

Transcripts of testimony:
Volume 1-Walter Cavagnaro on behalf of Pacific Gas & Electric, December 1976
Volume 2-John Cooper on behalf of Pacific Gas & Electric, December 1976
John Cooper on behalf of Pacific Gas & Electric, April 1977
George Amaroli on behalf of the Commission staff, April 1977

Exhibits:
Pacific Gas and Electric-Prepared testimony
Pacific Gas and Electric-Conservation

Boxes 21-22:  Palau Superport (1976-78)

Box 21

Correspondence, 1976
Correspondence, 1977
Memoranda—Legal, 1976

Media:
Clippings, 1976
Clippings, 1977
Clippings, 1978
Press releases, 1977

Environmental Defense Fund, Save Palau Organization, Natural Resources Defense Council
v. Thomas E. Kleppe, Fred M. Zeder, Emmett T. Rice

Draft complaint, n.d.

Hearings before the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, United States Senate,
March 24 & 25, 1977

Testimony / Statements:
Drake Wilson, Deputy Director of Civil Works, Department of the Army
James A. Joseph, Under Secretary of the Department of the Interior
David B. Roe, Environmental Defense Fund
Testimony of Ruby I. Compton, Natural Resources Defense Council
Chief Ibedul Gibbons, Palau Islands, United States Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands
Jackson R. Ngiraingas, representing some people of Peleliu under the auspices of Acting Chief Obak
Robert Panero Associates
Tia Beluad Movement

Answers to Information Requests:
Documents: Correspondence of the Department of the Interior,
Documents: Government documents of the District of Palau
Documents: Correspondence of the Environmental Protection Agency
Documents: Micronesian Support Committee

Box 22

Documents: Micronesian Support Committee
Documents: Correspondence of the Natural Resources Defense Council
Documents: Save Palau Organization
Documents: 13th Pacific Science Congress of the Pacific Science Association

Documents: Reports [See OPAC]

Herz, M.J., ed. (1977). Palau and the superport: The development of an ocean ethic.
            San Francisco, California: Ocean Research and Policy Institute of the Oceanic Society.

Robert Panero Associates. (1975). Port Pacific at Palau: Development of an international petroleum
            transshipment port/storage center and energy-industry complex at Palau in the
            Western Pacific.

Van Houten Associates. (1976). Site screening prefeasibility study for a petroleum
            transshipment terminal in the district of Palau. New York: Van Houten Associates-
            Ammann & Whitney.

Boxes 23-29:  Application by Pacific Gas & Electric for Authority to Increase Rates
               for Electric and Gas Services (1977-1979)

Box 23

Applications Nos. 57284/5 by PG&E for authority to increase rates for electric and gas service
before the Public Utilities Commission of California

Memoranda:
Case approval, November 1977
Legal and procedural issues, 1978

Media clippings, 1977-1978

Pleadings:
Application for authority to increase rates & charges, May 1977
Amendment to application no. 57284, June 1977
Environmental Defense Fund’s motion to dismiss, June-July 1977
September-December 1977
March-April 1978

Opening briefs, May 1978:
Airco and General Motors
California Farm Bureau Federation
California Manufacturers Association
California Retailers Association
Environmental Defense Fund
Kerr-McGee Chemical Corporation
City of Oakland
City and County of San Francisco
City of Palo Alto

Box 24

Pleadings—opening briefs, May 1978:
California Association of Utility Shareholders
Toward Utility Rate Normalization
Pacific Gas & Electric
State Energy Resources and Development Commission
Commission staff

Decision no. 89316, September 1978
Applications for re-hearing of Decision 89316, October-December 1978

EDF et al. v. Public Utilities Commission of California S.F. Nos. 23961-5
(Supreme Ct. of California)

Petition for writ of review of Decision no. 89316, December 1978

Box 25

Applications Nos. 57284/5 by PG&E for authority to increase rates for electric and gas service
before the Public Utilities Commission of California

Briefs—Environmental Defense Fund
Exhibits in support of applications

Box 26

EDF et al. v. Public Utilities Commission of California S.F. Nos. 23961-5
(Supreme Ct. of California)

Respondent’s answer to petition, December 1978

Applications Nos. 57284/5 by PG&E for authority to increase rates for electric and gas service
before the Public Utilities Commission of California

Transcripts of testimony:
Volume 34-James Weil on behalf of the Commission staff, March 31, 1978
Volume 35-George Amaroli on behalf of the Commission staff, April 3, 1978
Volume 36 W. Randy Baldschun on behalf of the City of Palo Alto, April 4, 1978
Volume 36-George Amaroli on behalf of the Commission staff, April 4, 1978
Volume 37-Russell J. Leonard on behalf of the Commission staff, April 5, 1978

Box 27

Transcripts of testimony:
Volume 37-James Smith on behalf of Pacific Gas & Electric, April 5, 1978
Volume 37-Richard B. Fancher, April 5, 1978
Volume 41-Daniel J. Reed on behalf of the University of California, April 11, 1978
Volume 41-James Weil on behalf of the Commission staff

Exhibits—Prepared testimony:
Witnesses on behalf of the Cities of Palo Alto and San Francisco
Witnesses on behalf of the State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission
Witnesses on behalf of the Environmental Defense Fund
Witnesses on behalf of Pacific Gas & Electric

Box 28

Exhibits—Prepared testimony:
Submitted by Pacific Gas & Electric

Exhibits:
Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission
Pacific Gas & Electric

Box 29

Exhibits:
Submitted by Pacific Gas & Electric

Box 30

Exhibits:
Pacific Gas & Electric

Discovery:
Answers of Pacific Gas & Electric to data requests of EDF

Box 31

Discovery:
Answers of Pacific Gas & Electric to data requests of EDF
Answers of Pacific Gas & Electric to data requests of the Commission staff

Box 32:  Sundesert Nuclear Project-San Diego Gas & Electric (1977-1978)

Correspondence & media, 1977

Before the Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission,
Docket no. 76-NOI-2

Notice of intention to file an application for certification of site, September 1976

Energy Resources and Development Commission. (1977). Preliminary report on the
            San Diego Gas & Electric Company’s notice of intention to seek
            certification of the Sundesert Nuclear Project.

Comments on Natural Defense Resources Defense Council on the Committee’s
Final Report in the Sundesert Notice of Intention proceeding, ca. December 1977

Recommendations to the Legislature on whether and under what conditions the
Sundesert Project should be exempted from the requirements of Public Resources Code
Sections 25524.1 and 25524.2. Docket no. 77-NL-1 before the Energy Resources and Development Commission

Order instituting hearings, November 1977
Statement and exhibits of Department of Water and Power of the City of Los Angeles,
Applicant’s supplemental comments regarding proposed N.O.I. conditions, December 1977
Petition for reconsideration of Decision to approve the Notice of Intention, January 1978
Supporting documents to Staff Summary Report for Assembly Bill 1852 proceeding, January 1978

Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission. (1978). Minority Report to the
            California Legislature on Assembly Bill 1852.

Decision and dissenting opinion of the Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission, March 1978

Boxes 33-36:  Independence Power Plant, Arkansas Power & Light (1978)
           
Box 33

Application No. U-2903 before the Arkansas Public Services Commission

Correspondence, 1978
Memoranda, 1978
Media clippings, 1978-79

Application of Arkansas Power & Light, December 1977
Pleadings, March-June 1978

Testimony of O.V. Holeman on behalf of Arkansas Power & Light
Testimony of Jerry L. Maulden on behalf of Arkansas Power & Light

Box 34

Staff testimony of Phillip E. Bond on behalf of the Arkansas Public Service Commission
Testimony of Dr. Robert M. Spann on behalf of the Arkansas Public Service Commission
Testimony of Hal B.H. Cooper, Jr. on behalf of Attorney Gen. Bill Clinton
Testimony of W.R.Z Willey on behalf of Attorney Gen. Bill Clinton

Testimony of J.D. Phillips on behalf of Arkansas Power & Light
Testimony of Louis A. Guth on behalf of Arkansas Power & Light
Testimony of Arch P. Pettit on behalf of Arkansas Power & Light
Testimony of John S. Williams on behalf of Arkansas Power & Light
Rebuttal testimony of James H. Woodward on behalf of Arkansas Power & Light in response to W.R.Z Willey
Rebuttal testimony of Ivan Gibbons on behalf of Arkansas Power & Light in response to W.R.Z Willey
Rebuttal testimony of Leo T. Mahoney, Jr. on behalf of Arkansas Power & Light
Rebuttal testimony of John S. Williams on behalf of Arkansas Power & Light
Rebuttal testimony of John E. Kane on behalf of Arkansas Power & Light
Rebuttal testimony of O.V. Holeman on behalf of Arkansas Power & Light in response to W.R.Z. Willey

Testimony of Louis Fish on behalf of the Ark. Electric Cooperative Commission
Testimony of Richard Foltz on behalf of the Ark. Electric Cooperative Commission
Testimony of Louis Fish on behalf of the Ark. Electric Cooperative Commission in rebuttal to
Dr. W.R.Z. Willey

Testimony of Alvin J. Rowe on behalf of Conway Corporation et al
Testimony of Joyce T. Ferguson on behalf of W. Memphis Utility Commission
Testimony of Eddie Powell on behalf of the City of North Little Rock
Testimony of R.E. “Dick” Prewitt on behalf of the City of Osceola

Transcript of testimony, Vol. 1: Marion Ulmer on behalf of the City of Jonesboro, March 14, 1978
Transcript of testimony, Vol. 1 Louis Fish on behalf of the Ark. Electric Cooperative Commission
Transcript of testimony, Vol. 1 Richard Foltz on behalf of the Ark. Electric Cooperative Commission

Box 35

Transcript of testimony, Vol. 1 Arch P. Pettit on behalf of Arkansas Power & Light
Transcript of testimony, Vol. 2 Louis A. Guth on behalf of Arkansas Power & Light, March 15, 1978
Transcript of testimony, Vol. 2 J.D. Phillips on behalf of Arkansas Power & Light
Transcript of testimony, Vol. 3 J.D. Phillips on behalf of Arkansas Power & Light, March 16, 1978
Transcript of testimony, Vol. 3 William Cavanaugh on behalf of Arkansas Power & Light
Transcript of testimony, Vol. 3 Jerry L. Maulden on behalf of Arkansas Power & Light
Transcript of testimony, Vol. 3 John J. Harton on behalf of Arkansas Power & Light
Transcript of testimony, Vol. 3 O.V. Holeman on behalf of Arkansas Power & Light
Transcript of testimony, Vol. 4 O.V. Holeman on behalf of Arkansas Power & Light, March 17, 1978

Box 36

Transcript of testimony, Vol. 5 John S. Williams on behalf o Arkansas Power & Light
Transcript of testimony, Vol. 12 W.R.Z. Willey on behalf of Attorney Gen. Bill Clinton, May 30, 1978
Transcript of testimony, Vol. 13 W.R.Z. Willey on behalf of Attorney Gen. Bill Clinton, May 31, 1978
Transcript of testimony, Vol. 13 John S. Williams, rebuttal of Willey testimony
Transcript of testimony, Vol. 13 Louis Fish, rebuttal of Willey testimony
Transcript of testimony, Vol. 14 John S. Williams rebuttal, June 1, 1978
Transcript of testimony, Vol. 14 James H. Woodward rebuttal

Exhibits in support of the Attorney General (source unknown)
Exhibit in support of Arkansas Power & Light (source unknown)

Arkansas Power & Light, 1976 Annual Report
Statement of Attorney General Clinton in Independence Station siting case
before the Arkansas Public Service Commission, March 14, 1977

Boxes 37-40:  Applications of Pacific Gas & Electric for Authority to Increase Rates
for Electric & Gas Services (1978-1980)

Box 37

Application no. 58545/6 before the Public Utilities Commission

Index to pleadings
Applications by PG&E for authority to increase rates for electric and gas services, December 1978
Amendment to application, January 1979

Pleadings-briefs, July 1979:
Opening brief of Airco Corporation
Opening brief of General Motors Corporation
Opening brief of California Manufacturers’ Association
Opening brief of California Retailers’ Association
Opening brief of the City of Palo Alto
Opening brief of the City and County of San Francisco
Opening brief of Pacific Gas & Electric
Opening brief of the Commission staff
Opening brief of Sierra Club
Opening brief of Toward Utility Rate Normalization
Reply briefs, August 1979

Box 38

Decision no. 91107, December 1979

Pleadings:
Petitions for modification and/or re-hearing of Decision no. 91107, January 1980
Responses to petitions for re-hearing, March-April 1980

Exhibits:
Airco Corporation and General Motors
California Manufacturers’ Association
City and County of San Francisco
California Retailers’ Association
General Services Administration representing Executive Agencies of the U.S. Government
Pacific Gas and Electric—Electric Department

Box 39

Exhibits:
Pacific Gas & Electric—Electric Department
Pacific Gas & Electric—Gas Department

Box 40

Exhibits:
Pacific Gas & Electric—Gas Department
Toward Utility Rate Normalization

Boxes 41-50:  Nuclear Power Plants—Regulations (1978-1984)

Box 41

Correspondence, 1978-1979
           
Pacific Legal Foundation v. State Energy Resources Conservation & Development Commission
Civil no. 79-711-E (U.S. Dist. Ct., So. Dist, Calif.)

Complaint for declaratory judgment, October 1978

Pleadings—Motion for summary judgment and responses, December 1978

Box 42

Pleadings:
On the motion for summary judgment, February 1979
Interrogatories, February 1979
Memorandum decision & draft judgment, March-April 1979
On the motion to vacate summary judgment, April 1979
Memorandum decision and notices of appeal May-July 1979
Request for dismissal, 1982-1984

Box 43

Pacific Legal Foundation v. State Energy Resources Conservation & Development Commission
No. 79-3365 & 70-3382 (U.S. Ct. of App., 9th Cir.)

Pleadings:
Briefs on summary reversal, August 1979-January 1980
Excerpt of record, February 1980

Box 44

Pleadings:
Brief of appellants, February 1980
Briefs supporting reversal, February 1980
Brief of appellees, April 1980
Motion to dismiss, June 1980

Pacific Gas & Electric v. State Energy Resources Conservation & Development Commission
Civil no. S-78-527 TJM & S-78-527-MLR (U.S. Dist. Ct., E. Dist., CA)

First amended complaint for declaratory judgment, November 1978
Intervenors’ affidavits, December 1978

Pleadings:
Environmental intervenors’ motion to intervene, December 1978
Order-case re-assignment, April 1979
Motion to dismiss, April 1979
Intervenors’ memorandum in support of motion to dismiss, April 1979
Defendants’ interrogatories to plaintiffs, August 1979

Box 45

Southern California Edison answers to interrogatories, September 1979
Pleadings—Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment, September 1979
Pleadings—Exhibits in support of motion for summary judgment, September 1979
Pleadings—Memorandum in support for summary judgment, September 1979
Pleadings—Defendants’ memorandum in opposition to summary judgment, October 1979

Box 46

Pleadings:
Declarations in support of opposition to summary judgment, September 1979
Exhibits in support of defendants’ memorandum in opposition to summary judgment
Deposition of David J. Fogarty on behalf of the plaintiffs, September 1979
Deposition of Barton W. Shackelford on behalf of the plaintiffs, October 1979

Box 47

Deposition of Barton W. Shackelford, October 1979
Deposition of Geoffrey T. Skidmore, November 1979
Deposition of Mason Willrich, January 1980

Box 48

Pleadings—summary judgment, October-November 1979
Proposed judgment, January 1980
Opinion, April 1980
Notice of appeal, May 1980

Pacific Gas & Electric v. State Energy Resources Conservation & Development Commission
No. 80-4265 & 80-4273 (U.S. Ct of App., 9th Cir.)

Pleadings—briefs:
Amicus Curiae State of Maine in support of reversal
Amicus Curiae North Caroline Attorney General’s Office
Amicus Curiae State of Arkansas in support of reversal
Public Utilities Commission of the State of California
Appellants Natural Resources Defense Council
Amicus Curiae State of Illinois in support of reversal
Amicus Curiae State of Massachusetts in support of reversal
Amicus Curiae Atomic Industrial Forum
Amicus Curiae Edison Electric Institute

Box 49

Pleadings—briefs:
Appellees’ brief
Appellants’ brief
Amicus Curiae Commonwealth of Pennsylvania in support of reversal
Amicus Curiae State of Idaho in support of reversal

Opinion, October 1981
Petitions for re-hearing, October 1981

Box 50

Pacific Gas & Electric v. State Energy Resources Conservation & Development Commission
(U.S. Supreme Ct.)
Pacific Legal Foundation v. State Energy Resources Conservation & Development Commission
(U.S. Supreme Ct.)

Petitions for writ of certiorari to the U.S. Ct of Appeals, 9th Circuit, April 1982
Consolidated response to petitions for writ of certiorari, April 1982

Box 51:  Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Plant Units 4 & 5, Arizona (1979)

Construction permits proceeding before the Nuclear Regulatory Commission-
Atomic Safety & Licensing Board

Correspondence, 1979
Media clippings, 1979
Comments of the Environmental Defense Fund on the Draft Environmental Impact Statement for
Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station Units 4 & 5

Pleadings, April 1979
Pleadings, May 1979
Pleadings, June-August 1979

Boxes 52-59:  Order Instituting Investigation No. 26: Pacific Gas & Electric’s Electric
Resource Plan, Alternatives and Rate-making Implications of Various Plans (1979-1982)

Box 52

Correspondence, 1979
Correspondence, 1980
Correspondence, 1981

Media clippings—conservation, 1979
Media clippings—conservation, 1980

Pleadings—pre-hearing conference, January-March 1979
Pleadings—Phase II (Conservation), March-August 1979
Pleadings—briefs, August 1979
Pleadings, September 1979
Pleadings, October 1979
Pleadings—Decision no. 91109 & summary of record, December 1979
Pleadings—Briefs-Phase III (Methodology), January 1980
Pleadings—Briefs—Phase I (Re-powering, maintenance & small hydroelectric), March 1980
Pleadings, July-August 1980

Box 53

Pleadings, August 1980-January 1981

Testimony transcripts:
Volume 1-PG&E Witness Joseph G. Meyer-cogeneration
Volume 2-PG&E Witness Joseph G. Meyer-cogeneration
Volume 2-PG&E Witness William Gallavan-auxiliary power sources
Volume 5-PG&E Witness Samuel D. Wells-auxiliary power sources
Volume 5-PG&E Witness Richard B. Myers-cogeneration
Volume 6 Calif. Public Utilities Commission witness Nolan H. Daines-cogeneration
Volume 7-UC Board of Regents witness Harry K. Winters-cogeneration
Volume 7-CA Air Resources Board witness Gary Rubinstein
Volume 8-UC Board of Regents witness Harry K. Winters-cogeneration
Volume 9-PG&E Witness Joseph G. Meyer-cogeneration
Volume 9- Calif. Public Utilities Commission witness Ida Goalwin-cogeneration
Volume 9- Calif. Public Utilities Commission witness Albert J. Stoddart-cogeneration
Volume 10- Calif. Public Utilities Commission witness Jeevan Ahuja-cogeneration
Volume 10-John Lakeland-cogeneration system
Volume 11-Calif. Energy Commission witnesses Weisenmiller & Dier-cogeneration
Volume 12-Calif. Air Resources Board witness Gary Rubinstein
Volume 15- Calif. Public Utilities Commission witness John L. Dutcher-cogeneration
Volume 15- Calif. Public Utilities Commission witness Burton W. Mattson-cogeneration

Box 54

Testimony transcripts:
Volume 16-Calif. Public Utilities Commission witness Burton W. Mattson-cogeneration
Volume 19-EDF witness Daniel Kirshner-methodology
Volume 20-EDF witness Daniel Kirshner-methodology
Volume 21-EDF witness Daniel Kirshner-methodology
Volume 22-EDF witness Daniel Kirshner-methodology
Volume 22-PG&E witness Howard W. Pifer-methodology
Volume 23-PG&E witness Howard W. Pifer-methodology
Volume 24-PG&E witness Howard W. Pifer-methodology
Volume 25-PG&E witness Howard W. Pifer-methodology
Volume 26-PG&E witness Howard W. Pifer-methodology
Volume 27-Calif. Public Utilities Commission witness Raymond Czahar-methodology
Volume 28-EDF witness Daniel Kirshner-methodology
Volume 29-EDF witness Irvin C. Bupp
Volume 30- Calif. Public Utilities Commission witness Raymond Czahar-methodology
Volume 33-EDF witness Irvin C. Bupp-methodology
Volume 34- PG&E witness Howard W. Pifer-methodology
Volume 35-Calif. Public Utilities Commission witness Raymond Czahar-methodology
Volume 44-Southern California Edison-Lawrence Papay-wind energy

Box 55

Testimony transcripts:
Volume 45-Southern California Edison-John Stolpe-wind energy
Volume 46-Southern California Edison-John Stolpe-wind energy
Volume 46-Southern California Edison-Stephen Barrett-wind energy
Volume 46-Southern California Edison-Vincent Schwent-wind energy
Volume 47-Southern California Edison-John Doyle-wind energy
Prepared testimony of PanAero Corporation-wind energy

Exhibits to testimony:
#1-19
#20-27
#39-47
#48-54
#55

Box 56

Exhibits to testimony:
#56-59
#60-64
#66-69
#70-79

Box 57

Exhibits to testimony:
#80-89
#90-92, 96-99
#102-105(c)
#111-112
Un-numbered exhibits: Prepared testimonies of Calif. Public Utilities Commission & PG&E

Discovery:
PG&E answers to data requests, 1978
PG&E answers to data requests of EDF, 1978
PG&E answers to data requests of Calif. Public Utilities Commission, 1980
PG&E answers to data requests of EDF, 1980-81
Southern California Edison answers to data requests of California Energy Commission, 1981
Document production-CA Air Resources Board-cogeneration phase
Document production-Pacific Gas & Electric-Long Term Resource Planning 1981-2000
Document production-Pacific Gas & Electric-Progress report on cogeneration & auxiliary sources

Box 58

Discovery:
Document production-PG&E-Energy Conservation Activities, 1981-1983
Document production-PG&E-Re-powering & maintenance
Document production-PG&E-wind energy
Document production-San Diego Gas & Electric-cogeneration
Document production-Southern California Edison-wind energy

Background:
Hearing notes, April-November 1979
“Energy Efficiency & Utilities: New Directions” [symposium, Stanford], 1980

Box 59

California Public Utilities Commission application no. 82-11-43
EDF request for fees & costs

Correspondence, 1982-85
Memoranda-legal research, 1984-86

Index to pleadings
Pleadings-application of EDF for attorney fees & expert witnesses costs, November 1982
Pleadings-comments on application, May 1983
Pleadings-Decision no. 84-09-006; opinion of the Commission
Pleadings-petition for re-hearing of decision
Pleadings-Verified statement of EDF in support of claim, 1984
Pleadings, 1985
Pleadings-Declaration of Thomas Graff (EDF Sr. Attorney)
Pleadings-Declaration of David Roe (EDF Sr. Attorney)
Pleadings-Declaration of Zach Willey (EDF Economist)
Pleadings-attorneys’ declarations in support of claim

Boxes 60-66:  Order Instituting Investigation No. 42: Financing Solar Energy Systems
                       (1979-1982)

Box 60

Correspondence, 1979
Correspondence, 1980
Correspondence, 1981-83

Media clippings, 1980

Order instituting investigation no. 42, May 1979
Responses to Order Instituting Investigation No. 42, June 1979
Pleadings, November 1979
Pleadings-opening briefs, November-December 1979
Pleadings, January-February 1980

Box 61

Pleadings, March 1980
Pleadings, April 1980
Pleadings, June 1980
Pleadings-briefs, June 1980

Box 62

Pleadings-briefs, June 1980
Decision No. 92251: Opinion and order-Demonstration of Solar Financing Program
Pleadings, September-October 1980
Petition for modification of Decision no. 92251
Petitions for re-hearing of Decision no. 92251, October 1980
Application no. 59724 of San Diego G&E to increase rates to implement solar energy programs
Decision no. 92501 modifying no. 92251, December 1980
Comments on decision no. 92501, January 1981
Pleadings, January-March 1981

Box 63

App. 60056 of PG&E to increase rates to implement solar financing program
Pleadings-briefs, May 1981
Pleadings, June-July 1981
Decision no. 93774-interim opinion, November 1981
Petition for modification of Decision no. 93774
Petition for modification of Decision 92251
Pleadings, April 1982
Pleadings, September-October 1982
Application to modify Decision nos. 92251 & 83-10-014
Pleadings, 1984

Box 64

Testimony & exhibits:
Witnesses of the California Energy Commission
Witnesses of the California Public Utilities Commission
Witnesses of the California Public Utilities Commission
Witnesses of the California Public Utilities Commission
Witnesses of the California Public Utilities Commission
Witnesses of the California Public Utilities Commission
Witnesses of Grumman Energy Systems
Witnesses of the Natural Resources Defense Council
Witnesses of Pacific Gas & Electric

Box 65

Witnesses of Pacific Gas & Electric
Witnesses of Pacific Gas & Electric
Witnesses of Pacific Gas & Electric
Witnesses of San Diego Gas & Electric
Witnesses of Southern California Edison Company
General testimony
General testimony

Reports by subject:
Low income solar equity program
Solar water heater system financing
Solar water heater system financing
Solar water heater system financing

Box 66

Public Utilities Commission Solar Financing Advisory Committee:
Evaluation sub-committee roster
Correspondence, 1980-1982
Meeting minutes, September 1980, April 1981
Meeting minutes, May-June 1981
Meeting minutes, July 1981
Meeting minutes, September 1981
Meeting minutes, November-December 1981
Meeting minutes, January-March 1982
Documents-California Solar Energy Industries Association
Documents-Solar Assisted Gas Energy-feedback & evaluation
Documents-Decision 92251-Demonstration Solar Financing Program
Documents-Demonstration Financing Program evaluation plans

Box 67

Documents-Demonstration Financing Program-installation standards
Documents-Demonstration Financing Program-warranties

Box 68: Coal Severance Tax, Montana (1980)

Commonwealth Edison Company et al. v. State of Montana et al. (U.S. Supreme Ct.)
on appeal from the Supreme Ct. of the State of Montana

Motion to dismiss or affirm

Pleadings—Briefs:
Environmental Defense as amicus curiae
United States as amicus curiae
Brief of appellants
Brief of appellees
Brief of the States of New Jersey & Michigan as amici curiae
Opinion

Boxes 69-87:  Allen Warner Valley Energy System (1980-1983)

Box 69

Application No. 59308 before the Public Utilities Commission of California

Correspondence, 1980-83
Media, 1979-81

Pre-hearing conference transcript, February 1980
Notice of hearing, March 1980

Pleadings:
March-April 1980
May 1980
June 1980
August 1980
September 1980
January-February 1981

Pleadings—Fees and costs:
March 1981
April 1981

Interim opinion on EDF’s application for compensation; Decision 93724
Application for re-hearing of decision 93724
Pleadings, May-June 1983

Order closing proceedings, October 1983

Box 70

Declarations in support of EDF’s application for counsel and expert witnesses’ fees & costs

Box 71

Testimony transcripts:
Index
Volume 01—Nevada Power Company, April 15, 1980
Volume 02—Nevada Power Company, April 16, 1980
Volume 03—Southern California Edison, April 17, 1980
Volume 04—On behalf of applicants PG & E and Southern California Edison, April 18, 1980
Volume 05—On behalf of applicants PG & E and SCE, April 21, 1980
Volume 06—Southern California Edison, April 22, 1980
Volume 07—Pacific Gas & Electric, April 23, 1980
Volume 08—Southern California Edison, April 24, 1980
Volume 09--Southern California Edison, April 25, 1980
Volume 10—Southern California Edison, May 1, 1980
Volume 11—Southern California Edison, May 2, 1980
Volume 12—Southern California Edison, May 5, 1980

Box 72

Volume 13—Southern California Edison, May 6, 1980
Volume 14—Southern California Edison, May 27, 1980
Volume 15—Southern California Edison, May 28, 1980
Volume 16—Pacific Gas & Electric, May 29, 1980
Volume 17—Pacific Gas & Electric, June 2, 1980
Volume 18—Pacific Gas & Electric, June 3, 1980
Volume 19—Pacific Gas & Electric, June 4, 1980
Volume 20—Pacific Gas & Electric, June 5, 1980
Volume 21—Pacific Gas & Electric, June 6, 1980
Volume 22—Pacific Gas & Electric, June 11, 1980
Volume 23—Pacific Gas & Electric, June 12, 1980
Volume 24—Pacific Gas & Electric, June 13, 1980
Volume 25—Pacific Gas & Electric, June 23, 1980

Box 73

Volume 26—Pacific Gas & Electric, June 24, 1980
Volume 27—Pacific Gas & Electric, June 25, 1980
Volume 28—Pacific Gas & Electric, June 26, 1980
Volume 29—Pacific Gas & Electric, June 27, 1980
Volume 30—Pacific Gas & Electric, June 30, 1980
Volume 31—Pacific Gas & Electric, July 1, 1980
Volume 32—Southern California Edison, July 2, 1980
Volume 33—Southern California Edison, July 3, 1980
Volume 34—Southern California Edison, July 9, 1980
Volume 35—Southern California Edison, July 10, 1980
Volume 36—Southern California Edison, July 11, 1980
Volume 37—Southern California Edison, July 15, 1980
Volume 38—California Energy Commission, July 16, 1980
Volume 39—California Energy Commission, July 17, 1980
Volume 40—California Energy Commission, July 18, 1980
Volume 41—Individuals, August 5, 1980
Volume 42—Environmental Defense Fund, August 12, 1980

Box 74

Volume 43—Environmental Defense Fund, August 12, 1980
Volume 44—Environmental Defense Fund, August 13, 1980
Volume 45—Environmental Defense Fund, August 14, 1980
Volume 46—Environmental Defense Fund, August 15, 1980
Volume 47—Environmental Defense Fund, August 17, 1980
Volume 48—Environmental Defense Fund, August 25, 1980
Volume 49—Environmental Defense Fund, August 29, 1980
Volume 50—Public Utilities Commission, September 10, 1980
Volume 51—Public Utilities Commission, September 11, 1980
Volume 52—Public Utilities Commission, September 12, 1980
Volume 53—Public Utilities Commission, September 15, 1980
Volume 54—Public Utilities Commission, September 16, 1980
Volume 55—Public Utilities Commission, September 17, 1980
Volume 56—Public Utilities Commission, September 18, 1980

Box 75

Volume 57—Public Utilities Commission, September 19, 1980
Volume 59—Public Utilities Commission, September 23, 1980
Volume 60—Public Utilities Commission, September 24, 1980
Volume 61—Public Utilities Commission, September 25, 1980
Volume 62—Comments on the Environmental Impact Report, October 6, 1980
Volume 63—Comments on the Environmental Impact Report, October 7, 1980
Volume 64—Public Utilities Commission, October 14, 1980
Volume 65—Public Utilities Commission, October 15, 1980
Volume 66—Public Utilities Commission, October 16, 1980
Volume 67—Public Utilities Commission, October 17, 1980
Volume 68—Public Utilities Commission, October 21, 1980
Volume 69—Public Utilities Commission, October 22, 1980
Volume 70—Public Utilities Commission, October 23, 1980

Box 76

Volume 71—Public Utilities Commission, October 24, 1980
Volume 72—Public Utilities Commission, October 28, 1980
Volume 73—Public Utilities Commission, October 29, 1980
Volume 74—Public Utilities Commission, October 30, 1980
Volume 75—Public Utilities Commission, October 31, 1980
Volume 76—Public Utilities Commission, November 3, 1980
Volume 77—Public Utilities Commission, November 4, 1980
Volume 78—Public Utilities Commission, November 5, 1980
Volume 79—Public Utilities Commission, November 6, 1980
Volume 80—Public Utilities Commission, November 8, 1980
Volume 81—Public Utilities Commission, November 10, 1980
Volume 82—Public Utilities Commission, November 12, 1980
Volume 83—Public Utilities Commission, November 13, 1980
Volume 84—Public Utilities Commission, November 14, 1980
Volume 85—Public Utilities Commission, November 24, 1980

Box 77

Volume 86—Public Utilities Commission, November 25, 1980
Volume 87—Public Utilities Commission, November 26, 1980
Volume 89—Public Utilities Commission, December 1, 1980
Volume 90—Public Utilities Commission, December 3, 1980
Volume 91—Public Utilities Commission, December 5, 1980
Volume 92—Public Utilities Commission/So. California Edison, December 8, 1980
Volume 93—Southern California Edison, December 15, 1980
Volume 94—Southern California Edison, December 16, 1980
Volume 95—Southern California Edison, December 22, 1980
Volume 96—Southern California Edison, December 23, 1980
Volume 97—PG&E, December 29, 1980
Volume 98—SCE/PG&E, December 30, 1980
Volume 99—PG&E, December 31, 1980
Volume 100—PG&E, January 5, 1981
Volume 101—PG&E, January 6, 1981
Volume 102—PG&E/SCE, January 7, 1981
Volume 103—PG&E/SCE, January 1981

Box 78

Volume 104—PG&E/SCE, January 13, 1981
Volume 105—EDF, January 15, 1981
Volume 106, February 19, 1981

Exhibits:
Index
Numbers 1-9
Numbers 10-19
Numbers 20-29
Numbers 30-39
Numbers 40-49
Numbers 50-59 missing 56

Box 79

Numbers 60-69 missing 65
Numbers 70-79
Numbers 80-89
Numbers 90-99 missing 93
Numbers 100-119
Numbers 11-119
Numbers 120-121

Box 80

Numbers 124-128
Numbers 130-139 missing 133
Numbers 140-149 missing 141, 147-48
Numbers 150-158
Numbers 160-169 missing 163-65
Numbers 170-171

Box 81

Numbers 171b, 175-179
Numbers 180-189 missing 182-83, 185
Numbers 191-199
Numbers 201-209
Numbers 210-219
Numbers 222-229
Numbers 230-239
Numbers 240-242

Box 82

Numbers 243-249
Numbers 250-259 missing 254
Numbers 260-269
Numbers 270-272c

Box 83

Numbers 272d-273, 275

Document production:
Documents of the California Energy Commission
Documents of Pacific Gas and Electric

Box 84

Documents of the Southern California Edison Company
Documents of the Utah State Office of the Bureau of Land Management

Environmental impact reports:
Bechtel Power Corporation, et al. (1975). Allen Warner Valley Energy System: Environmental Assessment. Volume 2

Box 85

Bechtel Power Corporation, et al. (1975). Allen Warner Valley Energy System: Environmental Assessment. Volumes 2-3

Box 86

Bechtel Power Corporation, et al. (1975). Allen Warner Valley Energy System: Environmental Assessment. Volumes 3-4

Box 87

Bechtel Power Corporation, et al. (1975). Allen Warner Valley Energy System: Environmental Assessment. Appendices

Comments on the draft environmental impact report of the CA Public Utilities Commission, 1980:
EDF
Friends of the Earth
California Energy Commission

Comments on the draft environmental impact statement of the Bureau of Land Management:
EDF
EPA
Nevada State agencies
Sierra Club Legal Defense Fund
Southern Utah Residents Concerned for the Environment (SOURCE)
County governments

Boxes 88-90:  Alton Coal Mine, Allen Warner Valley Energy System (1981-1986)

Box 88

Correspondence, 1985-86
Memoranda, 1980-84
Media clippings, 1979-82

Pleadings:
March-April 1981
Remand for consideration, September-November 1981
February 1982
May 1982
June 1982
August 1982

Box 89

Pleadings:
August 1982
September 1982
1983
February-June 1984

Deposition of John C. Ferrell, Volume 1 on behalf of Utah International, March 1984

Pleadings—Motion to dismiss:
January 1985
April-May 1985

Pleadings—Fees & Costs:
May 1985
July 1985

Box 90

Pleadings—Fees & Costs:
July 1985
August-October 1985
1986

Index to exhibits
Exhibits:
Numbers 1-4
Numbers 5a-5dd
Numbers 5ee-5tt
Numbers 5-9
Numbers 10-12

Document production:
Documents of the Nevada Power Company
Documents of the U.S. Dept of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management
Documents of the U.S. Dept of the Interior, National Park Service
Documents of the U.S. Dept of the Interior, Office of Surface Mining
Documents of Utah International

Box 91:  OII-100 Rules to administer request for witness & attorneys’ fees in proceedings
              before the Public Utilities Commission of California (1981)

Order instituting investigation by rulemaking, November 1981
Pleadings, December 1981-January 1982
Pleadings, February-March 1982

PG&E v. PUC S.F. 24606 (Supreme Ct, Calif) & related cases

Petition for writ of review of Decision 82-04-017 of the Public Utilities Commission

Pleadings:
August-September 1983
September 1983
December 1983-January 1984
May, September 1984
October 1984-January 1985

Boxes 92-99:  Application of Pacific Gas & Electric for Authority to Increase Rates for Gas
            & Electric Service (1981)

Application No. 60153 before the California Public Utilities Commission

Box 92

Correspondence, 1981-82
Media clippings

Application of PG&E for authority to increase rates & charges for electricity and gas
December 1980

Index to pleadings
Pleadings, April 1981
Pleadings, May 1981
Pleadings, July-August 1981

Pleadings-briefs, August 1981:
City of San Francisco
California Manufacturers’ Association
California Energy Commission

Box 93

Pleadings-opening briefs, August 1981:
California Public Utilities Commission
Environmental Defense Fund
Industrial users
Pacific Gas & Electric
Toward Utility Rate Normalization (T.U.R.N.)

Reply briefs, September 1981:
California Manufacturers’ Association
Commission staff

Box 94

Pleadings, September-October 1981
Pleadings, November-December 1981
Decision no. 93887, December 1981
Pleadings-re-hearing of Decision no. 93887, January 1982

Testimony transcript:
Volume 14-Pacific Gas & Electric witness James T. Doudiet

Box 95

Testimony transcripts:
Volume 15-Pacific Gas & Electric witness James T. Doudiet, April 8, 1981
Volume 16-James T. Doudiet, April 9, 1981
Volume 16-Robert J. Lozano, April 9, 1981
Volume 18-James T. Doudiet, April 21, 1981
Volume 38-General Motors Corp. witness Mark Drazen, May 28, 1981
Volume 38-California Energy Commission witness William Marcus, May 28, 1981
Volume 39-William Marcus, May 29, 1981
Volume 40-William Marcus, June 8, 1981
Volume 40-Pacific Gas & Electric witness Robert E. Burt
Volume 41-Pacific Gas & Electric witness Ross J. Cadenasso, June 9, 1981
Volume 41-Department of Defense witness Roy J. Shanker
Volume 41-Daniel Hegler
Volume 41-California Steel Corporation
Volume 61-Pacific Gas & Electric witness Joseph G. Meyer, July 8, 1981
Volume 61-Pacifc Gas & Electric witness Robert Michael Mertz
Volume 66-Catherine Waddell, July 15, 1981
Volume 66-William J. Flaherty
Volume 66-California Energy Commission witness Kenneth Meyer

Box 96

Testimony transcripts:
Volume 67—Pacific Gas & Electric witness James T. Doudiet, July 16, 1981
Volume 67—California Public Utilities Commission witness Ramesh Joshi
Volume 67—California Energy Commission witness James Hemlich
Volume 68—James Hemlich, July 17, 1981
Volume 68—California Energy Commission witness William Marcus
Volume 68—California Energy Commission witness Patrick Conroy
Volume 68—California Energy Commission witness Darryl Johnson
Volume 76—Closing arguments

Exhibits:
California Public Utilities Commission
Pacific Gas & Electric

Box 97

Exhibits:
Pacific Gas & Electric

Exhibits—Prepared testimony:
Witnesses on behalf of California Association of Utility Shareholders
Witnesses on behalf of California Energy Commission
Witnesses on behalf of California Public Utilities Commission
Witnesses on behalf of local governments
Witnesses on behalf of Pacific Gas & Electric

Box 98

Exhibits—Prepared testimony:
Witnesses on behalf of Pacific Gas & Electric
Witnesses on behalf of steel companies
Witnesses on behalf of Toward Utility Rate Normalization
Witness on behalf of US Department of Defense
Witness on behalf of Western Mobile Home Association

Box 99

Exhibits:
Pacific Gas & Electric

Boxes 100-103:  Nine Mile Point No. 2—Financial Implications of Construction
   (1981-1984)

Case no. 28059—Proceeding to inquire into the financial and economic cost implications of
constructing the Nine Mile Point Unit no. 2 Nuclear Station before the New York Public
Service Commission

Box 100

Correspondence, November-December 1981
Correspondence, 1982
Memoranda, 1981
Media-clippings, 1981-1984

Pleadings:
Pre-hearing conference, October 1981
EDF answers to interrogatories
Answers of Niagara Mohawk to EDF’s interrogatories
Opening brief of the Environmental Defense Fund, December 1981
Briefs, December 1981
Administrative Law Judge’s report to the Commission, January 1982
Staff’s proposal for an incentive rate of return, February 1982

Box 101

Pleadings:
Comments on incentive rate of return, February 1982
Opinion and order, April 1982
Petitions for re-hearing, May-July 1982
Order denying petitions for re-hearing, August 1982

Testimony:
Witnesses in support of continuing construction
Direct testimony on behalf of co-tenants

Box 102

Testimony:
Witnesses in opposition to continuing construction

Background documents:

Dvorsky, T.G., Bronner, K.M. (1981). The economic and financial implications
            of Nine Mile Point nuclear station and its alternatives. [Albany?]: State of New
            York Department of Public Service Power Division and Office of Accounting
            and Finance.

Box 103

Answers to interrogatories of the Environmental Defense Fund:
Central Hudson Gas & Electric
Long Island Lighting Company
New York State Electric & Gas
Niagara Mohawk Company
Rochester Gas & Electric

Boxes 104-107:  Conservation Programs that will Reduce Electric Use (1982-1984)

Case no. 28223 before the New York Public Service Commission

Box 104

Correspondence, 1982-1984
Copies of correspondence to ALJ Stewart C. Boschwitz from parties in proceeding
Memoranda, 1982

Interrogatories:
Responses of Central Hudson Gas & Electric
Responses of Consolidated Edison
Responses of the Environmental Defense Fund
Responses of the Long Island Lighting Company
Responses of New York State Electric & Gas
Responses of the New York State Energy Office
Responses of Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation

Box 105

Staff’s report to the Administrative Law Judge, June 1982

Briefs, 1982:
Environmental Defense Fund
Central Hudson Gas & Electric
New York State Energy Office
Empire State Petroleum Association
Rochester Gas & Electric

Recommended decision of Administrative Law Judge Boschwitz

Reply Briefs:
Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation, Consolidated Edison, Long Island Lighting Co.
New York State Electric & Gas Corporation
Natural Resources Defense Council & Environmental Planning Lobby
Environmental Defense Fund
Rochester Gas & Electric

Box 106

Briefs, 1982-1984:
Central Hudson Gas & Electric
Commission staff
City of New York
Niagara Mohawk & Consolidated Edison

Testimony, November 1982:
Central Hudson Gas & Electric
Consolidated Edison
Environmental Defense Fund
Natural Resources Defense Council & Environmental Planning Lobby
New York State Energy Office
New York State Electric & Gas Corporation
Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation

Box 107

Testimony, May 1983:
Public Service Commission staff
New York State Consumer Protection Board

Proposed shared savings program by the NYS Energy Office, March 1983
Comments on shared savings program
Utility compliance filings—conservation programs, 1984

Sub-group II.3: Energy Program—Project Files

SERIES 1: Committees and Meetings

Boxes 1-2:  Advisory Council to the Joint Committee on Energy Policy and Implementation
                    (State of California)

Box 1

Transcript of proceedings:
November 1, 1978

Box 2

Transcript of proceedings:
November 16, 1978
November 29, 1978
December 5, 1978
December 15, 1978

Sub-group II.4: Energy Program—Public Statements/Texts

SERIES 1:  Comments

Box 1

1973:
Habicht, E.R. (1973). Comments of the Environmental Defense Fund on H.R. 6602.

1976:
Environmental Defense Fund. (1973). Comments of the Environmental Defense Fund on proposed
            state appliance efficiency standards [California].

Willey, W.R.Z. (1976). The proposed North Fork Stanislaus River Project and SMUD peak load
            electricity consumption.

1977:
Graff. T.J. (1977). [Comments on the siting of facilities in California proposed by oil and
            petrochemical industries]. Letter to Governor Edmund G. Brown, Jr.

1979:
Terziev, A., Kirshner, D., Mastbaum, D. (1978). Comments of the Environmental Defense Fund on
            the significant issues and alternatives that should be analyzed in the U.S. Department
            of the Interior Bureau of Land Management environmental statement on the proposed
            Allen-Warner Valley Energy System in Utah and Nevada.

Kirshner, D. (1979). Comments of the Environmental Defense Fund on revised proposed
            general order 131-B, re: Order instituting investigation no. 36. Submitted to the
            California Public Utilities Commission.

Roe, D.B. (1979). Comments of the Environmental Defense Fund on proposed regulations to
            implement a power plant and industrial fuel act.  Submitted to the Department of Energy
            Economic Regulation Administration.

Kirshner, D., Willey, W.R.Z., Roe, D.B., Mastbaum, D. (1979). Comments of the Environmental
            Defense Fund on the draft environmental impact statement related to construction of Palo
            Verde Generation Station Unites 4 and 5, Arizona Public Service Company et al.

1980:
Environmental Defense Fund. (1980). Comments of the Environmental Defense Fund on the Office
            of Surface Mining’s Southern Utah petition evaluation document.

1981:
Roe, D.B. (1981). Comments by the Environmental Defense Fund on proposed report and proposed
            advocates’ trust fund. [Consumers Lobby Against Monopolies et al. v. Pacific Telephone and
            Telegraph Company, Case no. 10066 before the Public Utilities Commission of the State of
            California].

Roe, D.B. (1981). Comments of the Environmental Defense Fund on the suggested revisions to
            regulatory lag plan. Submitted to the Public Utilities Commission of the State of California.

1982:
Environmental Defense Fund. (1982). Comments of the Environmental Defense Fund on the
 proposed leasing of tracts within the Uinta-Southwestern Utah Federal coal production
region. Submitted to the Bureau of Land Management.

Stavins, Robert. (1982). Comments of the Environmental Defense Fund on Economic Analysis by
            Georgia-Pacific Corporation presented at public hearing on September 24, 1982 before
            the California Regional Water Quality Control Board.

1983:
Environmental Defense Fund. (1983). Additional comments to EPA on the IEMP pilot study,
            “Cost-effective pollution control strategy in the steel industry”.

Roe, D., Marcus, D. (1983). [Comments on the final environmental impact statement for
            New Mexico Generating Station, etc.]. Letter to C.W. Luscher, State Director, Bureau
            of Land Management, New Mexico State Office.

Environmental Defense Fund. (1983). Comments on the draft environmental impact statements
            for the proposed New Mexico Generating Station and proposed leasing of federal coal
            in Northwest New Mexico.

Environmental Defense Fund. (1983). Issue scoping for the environmental impact statement,
            Eagle Rock Project, Snake River Idaho (FERC no. 2789).

Environmental Defense Fund. (1983). Comments of the Environmental Defense Fund on the draft
            environmental impact statement / environmental impact report Gasquet Mountain Project.

Young, T. (1983). Comments on the Environmental Defense Fund on the “Acid Deposition Fee
            Program”, proposed by the California Air Resources Board.

1984:
Roe, D.B. (1984). [Comments on Ute Mountain land exchange / Final environmental impact
            statement for New Mexico Generating Station, etc.]. Letter to C.W. Luscher, State Director
            Bureau of Land Management, New Mexico State Office.

Roe, David B. (1984). [Comments on the proposed risk evaluation methods to use in the IEMP
            Santa Clara Valley Project]. Letter to Forest Reinhardt, U.S. Environmental Protection
            Agency.

Marcus, D. (1984). [EDF Comments on the scope of a revised coal leasing environmental
            impact statement]. Letter to Robert Burford, Director, Bureau of Land Management.

Environmental Defense Fund. (1984). Comments on revised risk assessment, North County
            Recycling and Energy Recovery Center. Submitted to City Council, City of San Marcos,
 California.

Guyer, S.D. (1984). [Comments on Assembly Bill 284, the Western Radioactive Waste Disposal
            Compact]. Letter to Assemblywoman Marian Bergeson.

SERIES 2:  Testimony/Speeches

1973:
Hearings before the Subcommittee on State Energy Policy of the Assembly Planning and Land Use Committee (1973) (testimony of the Environmental Defense Fund).

Hearing of Assembly Committee on Transportation on recent and threatened shortages of oil and
gas (1973) (testimony of Thomas Graff).

Hearings on AB 1575 before the Subcommittee on State Energy Policy of the Assembly Planning and Land Use (1973) (testimony of the Environmental Defense Fund).

1974:
Habicht, E.R. (1974 May). The social origins and economic basis of the demand for electricity.
            Presented at the New Zealand Energy Conference, University of Auckland.

[Hearings on sulfur dioxide emissions standards before the Air Resources Board]
            (ca. 1974) Opening statement of Richard E. Gutting, Jr.

[Hearings on sulfur dioxide emissions standards before the Air Resources Board]
            (ca. 1974) (testimony of Jane V. Hall).

1975:
Habicht, Ernst R. “The Energy Puzzle:  Electricity Rates, Space Conditioning and Load Management;
            Some Examples of how the Pieces Fit Together to Match the Interests of Consumers and
            Environmentalists.”  Before the FEA Challenge of Load Management, a Convergence of
            Diverse Interests, Washington, D.C., June 1975.

Hearings before the Senate Public Works Committee (1975) (testimony of Ernst R. Habicht
            regarding the design of electricity tariffs).

Willey, W.R.Z. (ca. 1975). [Comments to the California State Energy Resources Conservation
            and Development Commission on Economic Sciences Corporation’s “A Methodology
            for California Electric Energy Forecasting and Analysis”.]

1976:
Hearings before the House Subcommittee on Energy Research, Development, and
            Demonstration (Fossil Fuels) (1976) (testimony of Ernst R. Habicht).

1977:
Before the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, United States Senate
            (March 24/25, 1977)(Testimony of David B. Roe on the legal implications of the
            superport proposal on Palau).

Graff, T.J. “New Directions in Consumerism.” Pacific Coast Association 60th Annual
            Convention. May 1977.

1979:
Before the Subcommittee on Energy Development and Applications of the House Committee on
            Science and Technology (1979) (testimony of the Environmental Defense Fund
            on the Office of Technology Assessment’s Report on the Direct Use of Coal).

Before the Subcommittee on Energy Development and Applications of the House Committee on
            Science and Technology (1979) (testimony of the Environmental Defense Fund).

Before the U.S. House of Representatives Subcommittee on Energy and Power of the Commerce
            Committee and the Subcommittee on Energy Development and Applications of the
            Science and Technology Committee (1979) (testimony of the Environmental
            Defense Fund on National Solar Policy:  Impact of Utility Financing on Solar Development).

Before the Select Committee on the Palo Verde Generating Station of the Arizona House of
            Representatives (1979) (testimony of the Environmental Defense Fund).

Before the Michigan Public Service Commission Case no. U-5979 (1979)
            (direct testimony of Daniel A. Kirshner, Environmental Defense Fund).

Before the Special Joint Committee on Nuclear Energy, Michigan State Legislature
            (1980) (response of Daniel Kirshner to testimony of Consumers Power Company
            and Detroit Edison Company).

Before the Assembly Committee on Resources, Land Use and Energy (1980) (testimony of
            David B. Roe on AB 2009 and AB 2223 [exemption of pesticides from California’s
            environmental law]).

1980:
Graff, T.J. (1980, September). Least-cost energy investment: A skeptics view. Conference on
 Utilities and Energy Efficiency, New Opportunities and Risks, Port Chester, New York. 

1981:
Before the Utilities and Energy Commission of the California Assembly (1981)
            (testimony of Environmental Defense Fund on utility financing of conservation
            measures and solar water heaters).

Before the U.S. Department of Energy, San Francisco, California (1981)
            (testimony of Environmental Defense Fund on National Energy Plan III).

Before the U.S. House of Representatives Subcommittee on Energy Development and
            Applications, Committee on Science and Technology (1981)
            (testimony of Environmental Defense Fund on utility financial problems and
            potential solutions).

Before the Colorado Air Quality Control Commission (1982) (testimony of
            Environmental Defense Fund regarding potential economic impacts on Colorado
            agriculture of an increment in the maximum allowable 3-hour ambient level of
            sulfur).

Before the Commission on California State Government Organization and Economy
            (1984) (testimony of the Environmental Defense Fund on toxic waste
            management in California).

SERIES 3:  Writings by Program Staff

1975:
Habicht, E.R. (1975). Peak load pricing for electric utilities: Some advances and implications.
            Draft manuscript.

Graff, T.J. (1975). [Proposed op-ed piece on electric generating plants in California].

Goldstein, D.B. (ca. 1975). Projecting an energy efficient California. Manuscript.

Willey, W.R.Z. (ca. 1975). Electricity consumption and investment finance in California.
            Manuscript.

Habicht, E.R. (1976). Improving the efficiency of capital investment in the energy sector of -
            our economy. Draft manuscript.

1977:
Habicht, E.R. (1977). The Natural gas sector:  Rational fuel conversion strategies, pricing policies
            and investment instruments. Manuscript for use by Transmission, Distribution and Storage-
            Technical Advisory Task Force-Rate Design, National Gas Survey, Federal Power
            Commission, Washington, D.C.

Habicht, E.R. (1977, December). Electric utilities and solar energy:  Competition, subsidies,
 ownership and prices. Paper presented at the Federal Trade Commission Solar
Symposium.
             

1978:
Kirshner, D., Willey, W.R.Z. (1978). A Case study in the economics of alternative energy resources
            in electric utility investment planning. Manuscript.

Roe, D. B. (1978). [Letter on alternative energy analyses by EDF].
            Letter to the editor submitted to The Sacramento Bee.

1981:
Roe, D.B. (1981). [On the problems of electric utilities]. Submitted to The Los Angeles Times for the op-ed page.

Environmental Defense Fund. (1981). A new alternative to completing Nine Mile Point 2 Nuclear
            Station:  Economic and technical analysis.

1982:
Roe, D.B. (1982). [On Nine Mile Point 2]. Draft submission to The New York Times for the
            op-ed page.

Environmental Defense Fund. (1982). User’s manual for ELFIN, an electric utility financial and
            production simulation model.

1983:
Marcus, D. (1983). Coal development proposals in New Mexico: An economic and technical analysis.
            Summary of comments on the draft environmental impact statements for the proposed
            New Mexico Generating Station in Northwest New Mexico. Manuscript.

1984:
Marcus, D. (1984). Southwest power markets. Paper submitted to the Department of Justice,
            Navajo Nation by the Environmental Defense Fund.

Environmental Defense Fund. (1984). Evaluation of “Risk assessment for trace element and organic
            emission, North County Recycling and Energy Center”.  Paper submitted to the
            City Council, City of San Marcos, California.

Environmental Defense Fund. (1984). The positive alternative to completing Shoreham and
Nine Mile 2. Manuscript.

Sub-group III.2: Water Program—Legal Papers

SERIES 1: Litigation and Hearing Files

Box 1:  Gillham Dam & Reservoir, Arkansas (1970-1973)

Correspondence, 1971-1972
Media-clippings, 1972

U.S. Army Engineer District, Tulsa. (1971). Final environmental impact statement: Gillham Lake,
            Cossatot River, Arkansas.

Environmental Defense Fund et al. v. Army Corps of Engineers, No. LR 70-C-203
(U.S. Dist. Ct., E.D., Arkansas, Western Div.)

Pleadings:
Complaint for injunction and declaratory judgment, October 1970
Memorandum opinion, November 1970-February 1971
Motion to vacate preliminary injunction and for summary judgment in favor of defendants
Motion for restoration or granting of injunction during pendency of appeal, May 1972

EDF v. Army Corps of Engineers No. 72-1326 (U.S. Ct. of App., 8th Cir.)

Pleadings

EDF v. Army Corps of Engineers No. 72-1169 (U.S. Supreme Ct.)

Pleadings-Motion for writ of certiorari
Brief in opposition and reply of petitioners

Box 2-3:  Denniston Creek Project (1971-1973)

Box 2

Correspondence, 1971-72
Coastside County Water District. Environmental Impact Report
            for the Denniston Creek Project, Phase I, February 1972

EDF et al. v. Coastside County Water District et al. No. 164677
(Superior Ct of Calif, for the County of San Mateo)

Complaint, December 2, 1971
Pleadings, December 17, 1971
Pleadings, December 20, 1971
Transcript of proceedings, December 20, 1971
Pleadings, December 21-30, 1971
Pleadings, January 17-21, 1972
Pleadings, January 28, 1972
Pleadings, February-March 1972
Order dissolving preliminary injunction, April 1972
Notice of appeal of order dissolving preliminary injunction, May 1972
Memorandum of decision, July 1972

Box 3

EDF et