Stony Brook faculty need to be aware of copyright law and fair use doctrine when utilizing the work of others in your teaching curriculum. Stony Brook's official policy on duplication of material protected by copyright is found here. This document provides a synopsis of your rights and responsibilities as established by the Copyright Act of 1976. A number of links are provided below for additional reference.
Copyright protection vests automatically in original works of authorship that are "fixed in any tiangible medium of expression". 17 USC § 102(a). Writings, images, art, movies, music, computer programs and other works are all protected by copyright law.
The protection applies even if the work lacks a copyright notice and is not registered with the U.S. Copyright Office. Although works in the ‘public domain’ (such as works of the U.S. government and factual data) do not enjoy copyright protection, copyrights today usually last through the life of the author, plus seventy years.
The State University of New York acknowledges the right of individual faculty members to copyright and publish works that they produce. By the same token, the faculty must acknowledge the value of copyrighted works produced by others.
Whenever you use another’s work in your teaching curriculum, you are using copyright-protected materials. Among the rights of copyright owners is the right to make copies and publicly display that work. A group of students – assembled or dispersed – would be considered the "public" under the law. As a result, educators may be violating third party intellectual property rights whenever materials are copied as handouts, uploaded to websites, displayed as slides or with other images, or when music, videos, and other works are performed.
Be aware that copyright owners have the right to sue individual infringers. Although they may also sue the University, that will not insulate a person who violates another’s intellectual property rights from the full force of a lawsuit. The penalties are significant – the court can award up to $150,000 for each separate act of willful infringement. Moreover, ignorance of the law is no excuse. Under the Copyright Act, the infringing party will still be liable for actual or statutory damages.
In the context of traditional teaching, the Copyright Act of 1976 includes a provision that allows instructors to reproduce copyrighted materials in the faceto-face classroom setting. 17 USC § 107, known as the “fair use” doctrine, permits faculty to use another’s work for purposes such as criticism, comment, illustration, scholarship and research, under circumstances that do not impermissibly infringe on the copyright owner’s fundamental rights to reproduce, distribute, perform or display the work.
Four factors must be evaluated:
The University of Texas has developed some useful guidelines for evaluating whether or not a given use is permissible under the fair use doctrine, at http://www.utsystem.edu/ogc/intellectualproperty/copypol2.htm#test
The rules for distance education, however, are significantly different. The fair use requirements that must be met to take advantage of the doctrine are much more rigorous when materials are uploaded to websites, available for transmission anywhere in the world, and can be easily downloaded, altered, or further transmitted by students and other users. Every such action - particularly the possiblility of uncontrolled dissemination - threatens the legally protected property interests of copyright owners.
Additional guidance is available at these useful sites:
The Visual Resources Association: http://www.vraweb.org/resources.html
The Music Library Association:http://www.lib.jmu.edu/org/mla/guidelines
The Copyright Management Center, Purdue University: http://www.copyright.iupui.edu
North Carolina State University: http://www.lib.ncsu.edu/scc/copyright/copyright4.html
Cornell University: http://www.copyright.cornell.edu/index.htm
Manhattanville College: http://www.mville.edu